Manuel v. City of Joliet argued today: Whether malicious prosecution claim may lie under 4A

Manuel v. City of Joliet argued today: Whether an individual’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure continues beyond legal process so as to allow a malicious prosecution claim based upon the Fourth Amendment. (SCOTUSBlog)

See Reason.com: Supreme Court to Weigh ‘Malicious Prosecution’ and the 4th Amendment

SCOTUSBlog: Argument preview: Does the Fourth Amendment govern a “malicious prosecution” claim, and if so, how?

Orin Kerr on Twitter: “SCOTUS to hear argument today in most boring 4th Amendment case I have ever encountered, Manuel v. City of Joliet.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.