Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

D.N.H.: No REP from gov’t installing camera on def’s grow operation in the woods

The defendant and a guy named Bain didn’t like each other. Bain hunted on defendant’s property with permission and stumbled upon a few marijuana plants which he reported to the police. Other than defendant’s conclusory statement Bain was an agent … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Open fields, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.N.H.: No REP from gov’t installing camera on def’s grow operation in the woods

Photography is Not a Crime: The Terrorists Have Won in Boston

Photography is Not a Crime: The Terrorists Have Won in Boston by Maya Shaffer: We can win the war on terror today, or we can choose to keep losing it. The success or failure of any terror attack is dependent … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Photography is Not a Crime: The Terrorists Have Won in Boston

NJ: Surreptitious recording of defendant and counsel in police interview room suppressed

The surreptitious recording of a meeting with defendant and his counsel in a police interview room when defendant turned himself in was suppressed and contrary to clearly established law. It led to discovery of witnesses. The indictment is not dismissed, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NJ: Surreptitious recording of defendant and counsel in police interview room suppressed

CA7: WI law of hotel ejectments reasonably relied on by officers to conduct hotel room search after arrest

Defendant was arrested as a parole absconder also known to be a forger and identity thief, and there was a printer in the backseat of his car. He was in a hotel room in Wisconsin, not registered in his name. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA7: WI law of hotel ejectments reasonably relied on by officers to conduct hotel room search after arrest

LA2: Removing back of cell phone to get IMSI for SW application didn’t violate any REP

Defendant’s cell phone was lawfully seized at the time of his arrest. Two days later, the back of the phone was removed to get the IMSI number (serial number) to get a search warrant. The contents of the phone were … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on LA2: Removing back of cell phone to get IMSI for SW application didn’t violate any REP

D.R.I.: It was reasonable to believe defendant in house entered on arrest warrant when his car had been there and his cell phone ping put him there

Police had reason to believe defendant was in the apartment they entered with an arrest warrant for a Hobbs Act home invasion robbery: “The Court finds that the police reasonably believed prior to entry that Mr. Stewart resided at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on D.R.I.: It was reasonable to believe defendant in house entered on arrest warrant when his car had been there and his cell phone ping put him there

W.D.Tex.: Only two hours of warrantless GPS monitoring doesn’t offend Jones

Two hours of GPS monitoring didn’t implicate Jones’s reasonable expectation of privacy standard because it wasn’t long term. Defendant didn’t own the vehicle with the GPS device on it, but he was an authorized driver, and that gives him standing. … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Only two hours of warrantless GPS monitoring doesn’t offend Jones

ACLU Press Release: ACLU, Portland Police Reach Settlement in Filming Case

ACLU, Portland Police Reach Settlement in Filming Case: PORTLAND – The ACLU of Maine and counsel for Portland Police Officer Benjamin Noyes have reached a settlement in a lawsuit brought on behalf of a Bar Harbor couple who were arrested … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on ACLU Press Release: ACLU, Portland Police Reach Settlement in Filming Case

E.D.Mo.: Having def roll up sleeves to photograph his tattoos at time of arrest was reasonable

Officers investigating child pornography found an outstanding arrest warrant for defendant, so they went and executed it first and did a search incident of the person. They also got a search warrant. They seized a cell phone and got a … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Having def roll up sleeves to photograph his tattoos at time of arrest was reasonable

W.D.N.C.: Police gathering IP information via a peer-to-peer connections is legitimate investigative technique

Police gathering of IP information about peer-to-peer networks is a legitimate investigative technique, and it violates no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Baalerud, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37650 (W.D.N.C. March 25, 2015).* 2255 petitioner’s sentence was increased for … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Police gathering IP information via a peer-to-peer connections is legitimate investigative technique

GA: Consent to DNA paternity test for sex with 12 year old didn’t bar use of test in criminal case

Defendant’s consent to a DNA test for a paternity test for impregnating a 12 year old didn’t preclude using the evidence in a criminal investigation for having sex with her. Defendant had to know that was possible. Andrews v. State, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: Consent to DNA paternity test for sex with 12 year old didn’t bar use of test in criminal case

E.D.Tenn.: Lack of warning book-in phone was being recorded required suppression under Title III; Fourth Amendment issue not decided

Defendant made a call on a jail phone from the booking area that had no sign or warning on the call that the call was being recorded. The Fourth Amendment generally means that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Lack of warning book-in phone was being recorded required suppression under Title III; Fourth Amendment issue not decided

Chicagoist: Are CTA Bag Checks Against Our Fourth Amendment Rights? [And NOBODY COMPLAINED?]

Chicagoist: Are CTA Bag Checks Against Our Fourth Amendment Rights? After four months of random bag checks at more than 40 CTA stations, the results are in: Officers checked 2,600 bags, found zero explosives and made only one arrest. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Chicagoist: Are CTA Bag Checks Against Our Fourth Amendment Rights? [And NOBODY COMPLAINED?]

AR: Investigating pot smell at motel, officers encountered man who reeked of marijuana; stop reasonable

Officers received a call from a motel complaining of the smell of marijuana. Walking up the stairs, they encountered defendant coming down the stairs who reeked of marijuana and stopped him, asked about marijuana, and he produced a bag from … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on AR: Investigating pot smell at motel, officers encountered man who reeked of marijuana; stop reasonable

LA1: Court order for prescription records issued without probable cause violates right of privacy, federal and state

Court order for prescription records issued without probable cause violates right of privacy, as recognized by federal courts. Also, state’s constitution grants more protection. State v. Pounds, 2015 La. App. LEXIS 485 (La.App. 1 Cir. March 9, 2015):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on LA1: Court order for prescription records issued without probable cause violates right of privacy, federal and state

LA4: No procedure to reopen a motion to suppress after the verdict

No motion to suppress had been filed, so the appellate court doesn’t consider it. There’s also no procedure to reopen a motion to suppress after the verdict. State v. Marx, 2015 La. App. LEXIS 435 (La.App. 4 Cir. March 4, … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA4: No procedure to reopen a motion to suppress after the verdict

MA: No reasonable expectation of privacy in blood stain on defendant’s shirt that was lawfully seized as evidence after his arrest

There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in defendant’s shirt that was lawfully seized as evidence after his arrest. Thus, a search warrant was not required to test it for DNA of the blood found on it. This was not … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MA: No reasonable expectation of privacy in blood stain on defendant’s shirt that was lawfully seized as evidence after his arrest

Popular Science: Your DNA Can Now Be Used Against You in Court Without Your Consent [especially if you abandoned it]

Popular Science: Your DNA Can Now Be Used Against You in Court Without Your Consent By Lydia Ramsey A Recent Refusal by the Supreme Court Means That Involuntary DNA Collection Isn’t Unconstitutional Comment: No it doesn’t. This was DNA from … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Popular Science: Your DNA Can Now Be Used Against You in Court Without Your Consent [especially if you abandoned it]

SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks?

SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks? by Rory Little: Tuesday’s argument in City of Los Angeles v. Patel, a Fourth Amendment case, presents a particularly difficult example of a common Supreme … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks?

CA6: Motion to suppress body-cam video wasn’t timely or specific; evidentiary prejudice only real issue

Body-cam video admitted, and the motion to suppress it wasn’t timely, even if it would have been granted as showing a potential Miranda violation. The video showed what officers would testify to; to limit it would require it be overly … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Motion to suppress body-cam video wasn’t timely or specific; evidentiary prejudice only real issue