LA4: No procedure to reopen a motion to suppress after the verdict

No motion to suppress had been filed, so the appellate court doesn’t consider it. There’s also no procedure to reopen a motion to suppress after the verdict. State v. Marx, 2015 La. App. LEXIS 435 (La.App. 4 Cir. March 4, 2015).

While individual factors here may not mean anything alone, on the totality the court finds reasonable suspicion. State v. Nichols, 269 Or. App. 429 (March 5, 2015).*

While executing a search warrant for marijuana shipped from Los Angeles at unit 806 of a duplex, officers went into the crawlspace and could see through a hole into 804’s crawlspace and found more of the same boxes. The look was reasonable, and the hole lessened the reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Perry, 2015-Ohio-779, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 725 (5th Dist. March 2, 2015).*