Daily Archives: September 16, 2021

N.D.Tex.: First dog alert was before the dog jumped in the window, so the original alert was independent of that

“Because a positive alert by a drug dog creates probable cause to search a vehicle—and this alert occurred before the dog’s nose entered Castaneda’s window—the Court finds that regardless of whether the dog’s breach of the window amounted to an … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Pretext | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: First dog alert was before the dog jumped in the window, so the original alert was independent of that

D.Conn.: Handcuffing a concealed carry permit holder was without RS and unreasonable

“In light of the uncontested fact that Plaintiff presented his pistol permit to Defendant before or at the time he disclosed that he was in possession of a pistol and the absence of any other indicia that Plaintiff was otherwise … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Handcuffing a concealed carry permit holder was without RS and unreasonable

D.Minn.: Particularity in social media SWs is still evolving, and reliance on SW here was reasonable

Here, a Facebook warrant that allegedly lacked particularity was still close enough for the good faith exception. The law of particularity in social media warrants is still evolving, and it was reasonable for the officer to rely on the issuing … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Particularity in social media SWs is still evolving, and reliance on SW here was reasonable

CA1: Collective knowledge isn’t required of all officers, just those involved

Collective knowledge is not required of all the officers involved in the case, just the one with knowledge telling the one making the stop. Here there was reasonable suspicion for the stop. United States v. Cruz-Rivera, 19-1465 & 19-1509 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA1: Collective knowledge isn’t required of all officers, just those involved

CA3: Carpenter just doesn’t apply to jail call recordings

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in jail calls admitted to prove a conspiracy, and Carpenter doesn’t apply. “While we need not decide how far Carpenter extends to other technologies, it does not apply to prison phone calls. Unlike … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Carpenter just doesn’t apply to jail call recordings