Daily Archives: December 24, 2020

CA8 refuses to extend Bivens to case on false arrest on false evidence

Congress has to determine the scope of Bivens, and the court declines to extend it to a false arrest case involving a “rogue officer” alleged to have fabricated evidence in sex crime prosecutions. “This appeal is another chapter in the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8 refuses to extend Bivens to case on false arrest on false evidence

OH7: Drug testing of drug def after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable

A court ordered drug test after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable because it factors into sentence. State v. Fisher, 2020-Ohio-6829, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4672 (7th Dist. Nov. 7, 2020). Defendant, convicted of child pornography, had a release condition … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH7: Drug testing of drug def after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable

D.Md.: Taking driver’s cell phone with DL during traffic stop unreasonably extended stop and violated 4A

Taking defendant’s cell phone with DL during a traffic stop unreasonably extended the stop and was in excess of the purpose of a traffic stop. United States v. Morganstern, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240746 (D. Me. Dec. 22, 2020). A … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Md.: Taking driver’s cell phone with DL during traffic stop unreasonably extended stop and violated 4A

ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

Just because evidence was seized with a search warrant doesn’t make it admissible. The rules of evidence or other statute or rule still have to be complied with. City of Fargo v. Hofer, 2020 ND 252, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 264 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

E.D.Tenn.: SW for premises didn’t justify stop of car allowed to leave

A search warrant for the premises here did not justify defendants’ stop in their car after they were allowed to leave it. Moreover, there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop; no traffic violation, no nothing. United States v. Williamson, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: SW for premises didn’t justify stop of car allowed to leave