Daily Archives: December 22, 2020

Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’

Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’ by Rachel Lean (“An armed police raid of a fired COVID-19 data scientist’s home sparked a lawsuit Monday in Leon Circuit Court, which claims the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’

CA8: Forgetting to get SW signed for a vehicle didn’t matter where there was PC

The officer prepared an affidavit and search warrant for a vehicle search and took the paperwork to a state judge. They forgot to get the warrant signed. The search was still valid because there was probable cause to search the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA8: Forgetting to get SW signed for a vehicle didn’t matter where there was PC

CA5: GFE applies to SW with outdated Google Map image but with correct address

The good faith exception applies to the officer’s accidentally using an outdated Google maps image in a search warrant application but with a correct actual address. “The circumstances make clear that [Officer] Herron’s mistake was an honest one-a far cry … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: GFE applies to SW with outdated Google Map image but with correct address

D.N.H.: Separate PC was shown even though stop was made to aid DEA investigation

Officers wanted defendant’s car stopped and probable cause for a searched developed because they didn’t want to reveal a DEA investigation. The traffic officer waited for a traffic violation and then developed probable cause during the stop. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Separate PC was shown even though stop was made to aid DEA investigation

OH5: For collective knowledge, state needs to call all officers involved

Defendant prevails on his claim the state failed to show collective knowledge. Only one officer testified at the suppression hearing, and nothing showed what the reporting officer knew. State v. Chattoo, 2020-Ohio-6800, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4635 (5th Dist. Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: For collective knowledge, state needs to call all officers involved