Daily Archives: October 14, 2020

CA9: Bulge in clothing from a firearm justifies a stop-and-frisk in California

A bulge that appears to be a firearm justifies a stop-and-frisk in jurisdictions where concealing a weapon is presumptively a crime, here, California. United States v. Bontemps, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 32227 (9th Cir. Oct. 13, 2020):

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: Bulge in clothing from a firearm justifies a stop-and-frisk in California

MT: Private actor recording conversation on own didn’t violate state constitution

The Montana Constitution’s more “robust protection from government intrusions” still only protects against state action. A private actor recording a conversation without impetus from the state was not unreasonable. State v. Wolfe, 2020 MT 260, 2020 Mont. LEXIS 2436 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Private search, State constitution | Comments Off on MT: Private actor recording conversation on own didn’t violate state constitution

VA: Knock-and-talk is still a valid exception for entry onto the curtilage

While entry into the curtilage is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant, Collins v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 1663, 1670 (2018), there is still implied license for police to enter for a knock-and-talk. Saal v. Commonwealth, 2020 Va. App. LEXIS 241 … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Knock-and-talk is still a valid exception for entry onto the curtilage

CA2: CIs don’t need “a track record of reliability” when shown otherwise reliable

The CI was described in the affidavit for the warrant as “reliable,” but didn’t elaborate. “Circuit precedent does not require informants to have a track record of reliability. … Here, where the informant testified under oath before the issuing judge … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA2: CIs don’t need “a track record of reliability” when shown otherwise reliable

D.C.Cir.: Alleged seizure of open fields not a 4A claim, but it is a 5A claim

The North American Butterfly Association sued the federal government over a part of the Mexican border wall on their butterfly preserve being Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims. Their Fourth Amendment claim is dismissed because it involves alleged seizure of open … Continue reading

Posted in Open fields, Seizure | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Alleged seizure of open fields not a 4A claim, but it is a 5A claim

SCOTUS: Torres v. Madrid argued today

Torres v. Madrid, 19-292: Issue: Whether an unsuccessful attempt to detain a suspect by use of physical force is a “seizure” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 8th, 9th and 11th … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS, Seizure | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Torres v. Madrid argued today