Daily Archives: October 20, 2020

NJ.com: Murphy vetoes bills requiring cops to use body cameras, citing cost and privacy concerns

NJ.com: Murphy vetoes bills requiring cops to use body cameras, citing cost and privacy concerns by Blake Nelson (“Gov. Phil Murphy says he won’t sign two bills expanding the use of police body cameras unless lawmakers made several changes.”)

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NJ.com: Murphy vetoes bills requiring cops to use body cameras, citing cost and privacy concerns

N.D.Ohio: Giving a drug courier a duffel bag doesn’t allow one to retain standing under a bailment or joint possession theory

Defendant did not have standing under either a bailment theory or joint possession where a drug courier allegedly hauling his meth on a Greyhound bus had the bag unreasonably seized and searched. Defendant wasn’t there observing the courier holding his … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Giving a drug courier a duffel bag doesn’t allow one to retain standing under a bailment or joint possession theory

CA7: Ptf was a trespasser who had no REP

Plaintiff as a trespasser had no reasonable expectation of privacy to make a Fourth Amendment complaint. “Just as a trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the property, a trespasser also lacks a possessory interest in the property. The … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf was a trespasser who had no REP

CA1: Gunshot from within while waiting for SW justified entry and sweep

Police froze and surrounded defendant’s home while they sought a search warrant. While they were waiting, a gunshot came from within, so they entered in response. The government satisfied inevitable discovery even though this protective sweep ended up in the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: Gunshot from within while waiting for SW justified entry and sweep

D.D.C.: Search of def’s fanny pack wasn’t valid as search incident, but it was valid because he disclaimed it

Defendant’s front license plate being on the dashboard and not affixed to the car was a traffic offense that justified his stop. “Perhaps Giles recognizes that there was probable cause to arrest him after he refused to pull over and … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Search of def’s fanny pack wasn’t valid as search incident, but it was valid because he disclaimed it