Category Archives: Seizure

CA8: Detention of def’s semi for SW on PC was reasonable

Defendant was not in custody in this child pornography investigation when he was interrogated, and he even left the scene. “In light of the background investigation and Zavesky’s statements, law enforcement officers had probable cause to detain Zavesky’s semi-truck after … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Detention of def’s semi for SW on PC was reasonable

SC: Destruction of innocent’s building to end hostage situation not inverse condemnation so no recovery

The City of Spartanburg ended a hostage situation in a convenience store by using a bulldozer to breach a wall. After it was over, the owner couldn’t afford to fix it, so the city condemned it and tore it down. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on SC: Destruction of innocent’s building to end hostage situation not inverse condemnation so no recovery

CT: Two police cars converging on def and telling him to stop was a seizure

Two police cars driving at defendant in a Subway parking lot from different directions and stopping him was a stop. And, he was ordered to stop by an officer. State v. Edmonds, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 251 (Sept. 13, 2015) (concur; … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CT: Two police cars converging on def and telling him to stop was a seizure

VI: Nervousness is not RS; patdown unjustified and no reason shown

Defendant’s stop was admittedly justified, but the detention was without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Mere nervousness isn’t enough, and the officer didn’t articulate more. A patdown was unreasonable. People v. Hodge, 2016 V.I. LEXIS 123 (Aug. 24, 2016). Defendant showed … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on VI: Nervousness is not RS; patdown unjustified and no reason shown

CA3: Pretrial restrictions and order to appear are a seizure, adopting Justice Ginsburg’s Albright concurrence

A person under pretrial restrictions and ordered to appear (not merely summoned) is “seized” under the Fourth Amendment. The court adopts Justice Ginsberg’s Albright concurrence. Black v. Montgomery County, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15997 (3d Cir. Aug. 30, 2016):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Pretrial restrictions and order to appear are a seizure, adopting Justice Ginsburg’s Albright concurrence

cato.org: The Weird World of Data (and Your Privacy)

cato.org: The Weird World of Data (and Your Privacy) by Jim Harper: In 2007, Judge Richard Posner found it “untenable” that attaching a tracking device to a car is a seizure. But the Supreme Court struck down warrantless attachment of … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on cato.org: The Weird World of Data (and Your Privacy)

W.D.Pa.: Momentary compliance with officer’s commands then flight is not a seizure

Momentary compliance with an officer’s commands is still not a seizure under Hodari D. when defendant flees after that. United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 246 (3d Cir. 2006)). United States v. Ridgeway, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111537 (M.D.Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Momentary compliance with officer’s commands then flight is not a seizure

W.D.N.Y.: Def had hood of car open and police told him to put his hands up, he did, then fled; he was seized w/o RS [Updated: rev’d 12/13/16]

Officers saw defendant by his car with the hood open. Something about his elbow body language made them want to stop him. They told him to raise his hands. He did, then he fled. The court finds the directive was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def had hood of car open and police told him to put his hands up, he did, then fled; he was seized w/o RS [Updated: rev’d 12/13/16]

MD: The length of handcuffing did not turn Terry stop into a de facto arrest

Despite the handcuffs, the detention remained a Terry stop. “Use of handcuffs does not elevate an investigatory detention to an arrest when concern that weapons are present and officer safety provide the bases. Continued use of handcuffs after a frisk … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: The length of handcuffing did not turn Terry stop into a de facto arrest

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional? by Debra Cassens Weiss No. The fact police think it’s not speaks to their psychology.

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

CA7: Stop of car looking for ptf was unreasonable from inception; remanded, even if for nominal damages

Defendant was in a car leaving the scene of an earlier domestic disturbance call. The police were looking for him, but they had no idea he was in the car. The stop of the car looking for him was unreasonable, … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: Stop of car looking for ptf was unreasonable from inception; remanded, even if for nominal damages

CA11: On habeas, because law was “murky” about transportation on RS for an eyewitness ID, counsel can’t be ineffective for not challenging it

The law was murky at the time, and still is, that a Terry stop includes moving a suspect for a possible victim ID without requiring probable cause. Focusing somewhat on the merits, but mostly on whether the Florida appellate court … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: On habeas, because law was “murky” about transportation on RS for an eyewitness ID, counsel can’t be ineffective for not challenging it

CA5: Handcuffing for refusal to show ID on school parking lot, without RS, didn’t violate “clearly established law”

Plaintiff drove to his wife’s school, with his daughter in the back seat, to pick his wife up from work. Some busybody citizen decided that the vehicle on school grounds was suspicious and called the police. The officer asked plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Handcuffing for refusal to show ID on school parking lot, without RS, didn’t violate “clearly established law”

E.D.Wis.: Parking violation justified a seizure

“The police seized defendant Devon Bean for an alleged parking violation, locating drugs and a firearm while searching his person and car. Charged with possession of a firearm as a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and possession of marijuana with … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Parking violation justified a seizure

OR: State veterinarian taking blood from def’s sick dog was a seizure requiring a warrant

A warrantless search of a dog’s blood by a state hired veterinarian after seizure of the sick animal was a seizure by the state requiring a warrant. State v. Newcomb, 359 Ore. 756, 2016 Ore. LEXIS 366 (June 16, 2016):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on OR: State veterinarian taking blood from def’s sick dog was a seizure requiring a warrant

WA: FST is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment

Field sobriety test is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment or the more inclusive state constitution. State v. Mecham, 2016 Wash. LEXIS 695 (June 16, 2016):

Posted in Search, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: FST is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment

S.D.Fla.: One isn’t “seized” just because a law enforcement officer walked up to him

Defendant was not “seized” just because a police officer got out of a car and walked up to him and his cohorts. The fact nobody moved isn’t a seizure. Then, a plain view of drugs and a gun occurred, and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: One isn’t “seized” just because a law enforcement officer walked up to him

AK: Seizure of luggage and shipping back to Anchorage for dog sniff violated U.S. v. Place

When defendant arrived by plane to Dillingham, Alaska, officers, tipped off by a CI, asked for consent to search defendant’s suitcases for marijuana. He refused. They seized the suitcases and applied to a magistrate for a warrant. The magistrate said … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on AK: Seizure of luggage and shipping back to Anchorage for dog sniff violated U.S. v. Place

D.N.J.: Flight from a stop isn’t a seizure

Defendant’s former girlfriend reported to police that he’d threatened her with a gun. Police found him exactly matching the description, and they got out of the car and told him to stop. He threw down his backpack and fled. The … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Flight from a stop isn’t a seizure

N.D.Cal.: Civil seizures of counterfeit goods under 15 U.S.C. § 1116 are governed by the Fourth Amendment

Civil seizures of counterfeit goods under 15 U.S.C. § 1116 are governed by the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Shayota, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64388 (N.D.Cal. May 13, 2016):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Civil seizures of counterfeit goods under 15 U.S.C. § 1116 are governed by the Fourth Amendment