Category Archives: Particularity

D.N.J.: “including but not limited to” in SW was not overbroad; it had to be read in context

A search warrant with a particularity clause of “including but not limited to” was not overbroad and had to be read in context of the preceding language. United States v. Schaffer, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26257 (D.N.J. Feb. 24, 2017).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Independent source, Particularity | Comments Off on D.N.J.: “including but not limited to” in SW was not overbroad; it had to be read in context

DE: Just being involved in a shooting doesn’t give nexus to search a cell phone

The state here failed to show nexus between defendant’s cell phone and a shooting incident. In addition, the search warrant lacked all particularity — it sought to search three cell phones for data and calls without time limit or scope. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on DE: Just being involved in a shooting doesn’t give nexus to search a cell phone

E.D.Pa.: Particularity requirement has to be more flexible in complex cases

In complex cases, the particularly requirement has to be flexible enough to accommodate the substantial amount of information that will be sought and obtained. These two warrants, from 2011 and 2014, were constitutionally particular. United States v. Devos Ltd., 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Particularity requirement has to be more flexible in complex cases

M.D.Ala.: Omission of city and county from address in SW wasn’t fatal where place to be searched was still apparent

The fact the affidavit had the address but no city and county doesn’t violate the particularity requirement. Yes, it would have been better to have done so, but the officers still could find the place they were looking for, so … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Omission of city and county from address in SW wasn’t fatal where place to be searched was still apparent

E.D.Mich.: SW for human body parts wasn’t a general warrant

Defendant was accused of unlawfully trafficking in human body parts, and the search warrant for his premises for body parts was not a general warrant. United States v. Rathburn, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140562 (E.D.Mich. Oct. 11, 2016). [It seems … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: SW for human body parts wasn’t a general warrant

D.Kan.: USMJ’s email warrant denial for lack of PC affirmed, but gov’t can reapply because it has more info

The USMJ’s decision that the email search warrant didn’t show probable cause is not reversed, but it was sufficiently particular. The government can reapply again because it says it has additional information. Courts must balance privacy and the government’s ability … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: USMJ’s email warrant denial for lack of PC affirmed, but gov’t can reapply because it has more info

VI: Alleged consent at gunpoint after stop without RS was involuntary

Defendant was found to have been stopped at gunpoint without reasonable suspicion. Even if he said “‘do whatever you want,’ this Court finds that Schulterbrandt did not freely and voluntarily give his consent” to the armed force that just arrested … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Particularity | Comments Off on VI: Alleged consent at gunpoint after stop without RS was involuntary

MO: SW for first structure on left was particular where the actual first was a hidden building and second was a shed

Defendant claimed that the search warrant wasn’t particular enough because it described defendant’s house as the first structure on the left on private road. Defendant shows that there were two others, but the first wasn’t visible from the road and … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on MO: SW for first structure on left was particular where the actual first was a hidden building and second was a shed

OR: Search of computer’s browser history limited to the PC; here, 15 minutes, not two months; a computer is more of a “place to be searched” rather than a “thing to be seized”

Defendant was convicted of murder by child abuse. The only relation of a computer was his admission that he used a computer to search for symptoms when the child was sick 15 minutes before his 911 call. When the computer … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on OR: Search of computer’s browser history limited to the PC; here, 15 minutes, not two months; a computer is more of a “place to be searched” rather than a “thing to be seized”

N.D.Ga.: Use of an electronic “sniffer” to find a target computer in a college building was particular

Police used an electronic “sniffer” to attempt to find a MAC address of an operating computer in an Emory University building. “The affidavit described the plan to use a sniffer to ‘identify the wireless device associated with the suspect MAC … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Use of an electronic “sniffer” to find a target computer in a college building was particular

S.D.Tex.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest was valid

“Here, the seizure of Fulton’s cell phone during his arrest fell squarely within the exception articulated in Chimel and Robinson as a seizure incident to arrest.” United States v. Fulton, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83014 (S.D.Tex. June 23, 2016). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest was valid

OH8: SW for “Apt. #1” with white door was valid where there was only one with a white door, albeit No. 3, and officers were directed by color of door

The description of the apartment with the white door on the corner of the building, “Apt. #1,” proved incorrect because Apt. #3 was the only one with a white door. The officers executing the warrant were directed to the one … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: SW for “Apt. #1” with white door was valid where there was only one with a white door, albeit No. 3, and officers were directed by color of door

AZ: Serial SWs were justified by further developments in a serial murder investigation

Defendant was ultimately charged with 74 felonies, including nine murders. His house was subjected to three different search warrants, each specific to one or two crimes. It was reasonable for the police to get another warrant to go back after … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AZ: Serial SWs were justified by further developments in a serial murder investigation

N.D.Cal.: It’s generally not good to include “all” before the documents to be seized in a SW; PC must be shown for what “all” modifies in SW, and here it was

It’s generally not good to include “all” before the documents to be seized in a search warrant, but it is valid if it can be shown to relate back to something for which there is a showing of probable cause. … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: It’s generally not good to include “all” before the documents to be seized in a SW; PC must be shown for what “all” modifies in SW, and here it was

DE: Cut-and-paste SW led to overbreadth problem in witness tampering SW where child porn found and suppressed

This is a child pornography case. The search warrant was a cut-and-paste from a child porn warrant but the warrant was for evidence of witness tampering on a computer. Child porn was found. The result was a warrant that failed … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on DE: Cut-and-paste SW led to overbreadth problem in witness tampering SW where child porn found and suppressed

OH3: Particularity challenge waived by not presenting it to suppression court

The officer’s smelling marijuana outside defendant’s residence was probable cause to corroborate the story that defendant had a grow going on. A particularity challenge was waived by not presenting it to the trial court at the suppression hearing. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH3: Particularity challenge waived by not presenting it to suppression court

CA3: “Computer hardware” and “any equipment” in a child porn SW includes cell phones

“The warrant, as written, defines ‘computer hardware’ broadly. Horton does not and cannot argue that his cell phone is not ‘computer hardware’ as it is defined in the warrant, which includes ‘any equipment’ (emphasis added) capable of transmitting computer data. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA3: “Computer hardware” and “any equipment” in a child porn SW includes cell phones

D.Minn.: “other media” showing “address, vehicle, and location of narcotics proceeds” permitted seizure of cell phone

The search warrant authorized seizure of “other media that show standing for an address, vehicle, the location of narcotics proceeds, or a connection between people, addresses and vehicles or that a crime has been committed” and that permitted seizure of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “other media” showing “address, vehicle, and location of narcotics proceeds” permitted seizure of cell phone

CA6: SW for person by alias and description was valid when he was under surveillance from issuance to execution

Warrants are usually directed at places and things not people, but here was a search warrant directed at defendant by his known alias and description. From the time it was issued until it was executed, defendant was under surveillance. It … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA6: SW for person by alias and description was valid when he was under surveillance from issuance to execution

S.D.W.Va.: Heroin and other drug warrant was not overbroad despite boilerplate language

A search warrant for heroin that was otherwise boilerplate as to other controlled substances and all the things that officers always want to look for in drug cases was not overbroad. And good faith still applies. United States v. McCarrall, … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Heroin and other drug warrant was not overbroad despite boilerplate language