Category Archives: Motion to suppress

S.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW judicially estopped govt to claim no standing

The affidavit for the search warrant alleged the house was defendant’s house. The government was judicially estopped from claiming otherwise in the proceeding without real evidence the affidavit was wrong. [I’ve been arguing this for years; see Treatise § 4.03.] … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW judicially estopped govt to claim no standing

W.D.Ky.: Motion to reconsider denial of motion to suppress only raised a trial issue, not a suppression issue, so denied

Defendant’s motion to reconsider the prior denial of a motion to suppress is denied because he raises essentially only an issue for trial as to where a gun was found, not to suppress evidence. United States v. Keeling, 2018 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Motion to reconsider denial of motion to suppress only raised a trial issue, not a suppression issue, so denied

NY4: Man with a gun report led police within one minute to couple on street, and def abandoned gun

Police received a call of a man with a shotgun walking with a woman. Officers got there within a minute and saw a couple matching the description. No lights or siren were on. Defendant walked into a grassy area and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Man with a gun report led police within one minute to couple on street, and def abandoned gun

W.D.N.C.: Def counsel’s busy schedule not “good cause” for motion to file motion to suppress out of time

“In his amended motion for leave, counsel admits that he received the discovery in this matter from the Government on or about October 19, 2017, but states that he was not ‘in a position to effectively review’ such materials until … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def counsel’s busy schedule not “good cause” for motion to file motion to suppress out of time

CA8: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply to suppression hearings; hearsay commonly used

Defendant was added to a conspiracy case after the codefendants had a suppression hearing. It was at first agreed that their suppression hearing testimony could be considered as to defendant as well, but then defendant equivocated on that. To some … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA8: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply to suppression hearings; hearsay commonly used

PA: Telling computer repair person to move files to a new hard drive was a waiver of REP

Defendant essentially waived his reasonable expectation of privacy in his computer hard drive when he took it in for repair, was told that the hard drive was failing and he needed a new one, and then directed them to move … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Motion to suppress, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on PA: Telling computer repair person to move files to a new hard drive was a waiver of REP

FL5: Peeing in a parking lot is RS of “public nudity” justifying a stop

Peeing in a parking lot is reasonable suspicion of “public nudity” justifying a stop. State v. Harris, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 18994 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 15, 2017). Defendant’s rental company maintenance man was acting as a private citizen when … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL5: Peeing in a parking lot is RS of “public nudity” justifying a stop

E.D.La.: Not filing motion to suppress but joining in codef’s renewed motion to suppress was waiver

Where one defendant didn’t file a motion to suppress but joined in a renewed motion to suppress of a codefendant, the motion is treated as waived. The procedure attempted circumvents Rule 12. Moreover, he doesn’t even have standing. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Motion to suppress, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Not filing motion to suppress but joining in codef’s renewed motion to suppress was waiver

D.Mont.: Gun possession not stale after 5 months

A CI’s reference to guns in defendant’s house in Dec. 2016 was not stale by April 2017. Defendant’s arguments about a Franks violation are rejected for lack of materiality to the finding of probable cause. United States v. Wilson, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Gun possession not stale after 5 months

GA & Guam: Not getting a timely ruling on motion to suppress is waiver

Defendant didn’t get a ruling on his motion to suppress before trial. At trial, he didn’t object to one item being admitted but did to another, but not on Fourth Amendment grounds. Defendant waived his Fourth Amendment claim by not … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on GA & Guam: Not getting a timely ruling on motion to suppress is waiver

PA: No REP in CI recorded video in def’s car during drug transaction; also, motion was out of time and should have been denied on that ground alone

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his car under the state constitution from a surreptitious silent video recording of a drug transaction. The trial court erred in granting it. Indeed, the filing of the motion to suppress on … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: No REP in CI recorded video in def’s car during drug transaction; also, motion was out of time and should have been denied on that ground alone

W.D.N.C.: Timely motion to suppress was enough to have to continue trial date over def’s objection

Defendant filed a motion to suppress but didn’t want the trial delayed. Based on the time for the government to respond and the USMJ to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial would have to be continued … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Timely motion to suppress was enough to have to continue trial date over def’s objection

NV: Illegally recorded conversation by recorder in child’s backpack can be used by expert in child custody proceeding

In this child custody case, the father put a recording device in the child’s backpack to record the child’s interactions with the mother. While the recording violated state law, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting an … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NV: Illegally recorded conversation by recorder in child’s backpack can be used by expert in child custody proceeding

LA: Automatic denial of pro se motion to suppress filed by represented defendant was error; counsel needs to review

Trial court erred in denying defendant’s pro se motion to suppress solely because he was represented by counsel. At least as a matter of state law, it’s up to defense counsel to assess the motion and decide what to do … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on LA: Automatic denial of pro se motion to suppress filed by represented defendant was error; counsel needs to review

DE: Conclusory motion to suppress summarily denied

Defendant’s conclusory motion to suppress that states no law or fact is denied without a hearing. State v. Dunson, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 616 (July 7, 2017):

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Conclusory motion to suppress summarily denied

DE: two on motions to suppress out of time

Motion to file a motion to suppress out of time is denied for not showing a sufficient excuse. Even so, defendant doesn’t allege standing, so he couldn’t win if it was allowed to be filed. State v. Boyd, 2017 Del. … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: two on motions to suppress out of time

CA7: Def’s false suppression hearing testimony gets him 2 level obstruction sentencing enhancement

Defendant’s false testimony at suppression hearing results in 2 level enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Jones, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18204 (7th Cir. Sept. 20, 2017):

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA7: Def’s false suppression hearing testimony gets him 2 level obstruction sentencing enhancement

CA2: Waiting until trial to move to suppress computer was waiver

The FBI thought they had defendant’s wife’s consent to search his computer, but they realized she didn’t know the password, so they applied for a search warrant. Defendant waited until the start of the trial to move to suppress, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA2: Waiting until trial to move to suppress computer was waiver

NY4: Not granting a continuance of suppression hearing for unavailable witnesses was an abuse of discretion

The trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress for the nonattendance of its police witnesses after they were subpoenaed but didn’t show. The state sought an adjournment which the trial court denied. It was the first request for … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NY4: Not granting a continuance of suppression hearing for unavailable witnesses was an abuse of discretion

D.Haw.: Possible new evidence on search issue for motion for new trial doesn’t change outcome

Defendant’s motion for new trial based on possible new evidence for litigating the search and seizure claim under F.R.Crim.P. 33 is denied because it doesn’t change the outcome. United States v. Kapahu, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88922 (D. Haw. June … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Possible new evidence on search issue for motion for new trial doesn’t change outcome