Category Archives: Stop and frisk

Stop and frisk created by SCOTUS 49 years ago today

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was decided 49 years ago today, June 2d. The stop and frisk occurred on October 31, 1963. The Ohio Court of Appeals Eighth District opinion is interesting for its historical value: State v. … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Stop and frisk created by SCOTUS 49 years ago today

IN: Anonymous report of man with gun wouldn’t alone support frisk, but def fled

Police received an anonymous tip that a man matching defendant’s description had a gun in a bar. The officer arrived right after the call and saw defendant. Under state case law, that alone wasn’t enough for a frisk without more. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: Anonymous report of man with gun wouldn’t alone support frisk, but def fled

OH8: Citizen’s warning of sobriety checkpoints in Parma, Ohio was protected speech and not obstruction of governmental business

Defendant’s actions of having a sign and warning people of a sobriety checkpoint did not amount to obstruction of official business, so his arrest was unjustified. Ohio practice requires the police to warn of sobriety checkpoints, too. City of Parma … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH8: Citizen’s warning of sobriety checkpoints in Parma, Ohio was protected speech and not obstruction of governmental business

Two car and person searches suppressed for lack of RS

The USMJ “reasonably determined that although there was probable cause to stop the car in which Linaman was traveling for possible traffic violations, …, Deputy Tadlock prolonged the stop beyond the time reasonably required to investigate those violations and without … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Two car and person searches suppressed for lack of RS

N.D.N.Y.: Def’s prior drug involvement justified a drug search condition on supervised release

Defendant’s prior convictions for drugs from age 17-22 justified a drug search condition on supervised release. United States v. Betsy-Jones, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75157 (N.D. N.Y. April 28, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74113 (N.D. N.Y. May 16, … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Def’s prior drug involvement justified a drug search condition on supervised release

IL: Because def’s car matched description of a stolen car, it was reasonable to handcuff def

Considering that the vehicle defendant was stopped in matched the description of a stolen car, it was reasonable for the officer to handcuff him. People v. Richardson, 2017 IL App (1st) 130203-B, 2017 Ill. App. LEXIS 314 (May 12, 2017). … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Because def’s car matched description of a stolen car, it was reasonable to handcuff def

D.Nev.: Officer came to def’s house on a domestic call and had no RS def was armed; frisk invalid

Responding to a domestic call, the officer met defendant at the door and he was compliant and holding a bag. There was no reason to believe that defendant was armed, but a stop and frisk was done, actually finding a … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Officer came to def’s house on a domestic call and had no RS def was armed; frisk invalid

N.D.Iowa: Just because the officer had “unquestioned command of the situation” during a traffic stop doesn’t preclude conducting a frisk for weapons

Just because the officer had “unquestioned command of the situation” during a traffic stop doesn’t preclude the officer from conducting a frisk for weapons. Here, the stop was at night, in a high crime area, there were only streetlights, and … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Just because the officer had “unquestioned command of the situation” during a traffic stop doesn’t preclude conducting a frisk for weapons

CA11: “Armed and dangerous” report on def was enough for a patdown

The officer had reasonable suspicion for a patdown based on a BOLO for defendant that he was armed and dangerous. Defendant wasn’t in custody when he was asked about where the gun was. United States v. Hogan, 2017 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA11: “Armed and dangerous” report on def was enough for a patdown

E.D.Mich.: If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose

Defendant’s cell phone was seized from his car after a stop. If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose. A search warrant was sought for the cell phone. The affidavit for the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: If an inventory is otherwise valid, it doesn’t matter that it also had an investigative purpose

CA11: When one in a group in a high crime area flinches on seeing the police, others with him are subject to investigative detention

Officers approached a group of men standing in a high crime area, and one of them flinched on seeing the police. That was reasonable suspicion as to him and at least permitted a brief detention of the others in the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA11: When one in a group in a high crime area flinches on seeing the police, others with him are subject to investigative detention

IL: Frisk depends on RS def is armed, not just committing some nebulous offense

“We reject defendant’s argument he was seized when officer Harrold requested he remove his hands from his pockets and conclude defendant was not seized until officer Harrold frisked him.” … “Accordingly, a police officer must have reasonable suspicion the individual … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Frisk depends on RS def is armed, not just committing some nebulous offense

E.D.N.C.: Officers first said they were from Publishers’ Clearinghouse, then said “open the door or we are going to knock it down.” Consent after that was valid

Officers first knocked at door saying they were with Publishers’ Clearinghouse, but defendant didn’t come to door. Then they said in Spanish “open the door or we are going to knock it down.” It was on body camera. On the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Officers first said they were from Publishers’ Clearinghouse, then said “open the door or we are going to knock it down.” Consent after that was valid

W.D.Tenn.: Because ‘guns and drugs go together,’ faint smell of MJ plus furtive movement justified frisk

Defendant was stopped for a cracked windshield, which it clearly was. “Ordering Henderson to step out of the car was only a de minimis intrusion of his personal liberty, and it did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights.” “Officer Putman … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Because ‘guns and drugs go together,’ faint smell of MJ plus furtive movement justified frisk

IA: A claim of officer safety has to be objectively justified by the record; Rodriguez followed under state constitution

Iowa adopts Rodriguez under state constitution after a lengthy comparison of its own cases and cases from around the country. A claim of officer safety has to be objectively justified by the record; merely stating it doesn’t make it so. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IA: A claim of officer safety has to be objectively justified by the record; Rodriguez followed under state constitution

MD: A stop and a frisk have separate constitutional justifications; courts must confine Terry to its 4A mooring

This Terry stop failed reasonable suspicion and all tenets of Terry. [Subtext: Police are abusing Terry, and the courts have to control them.] Ames v. State, 2017 Md. App. LEXIS 121 (Feb. 3, 2017) (Moylan, J.) (caution: The Lexis version … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: A stop and a frisk have separate constitutional justifications; courts must confine Terry to its 4A mooring

OH6: Because OH limits minor misdemeanor searches more than the 4A, search of def because of marijuana flakes on shirt was unreasonable

Defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped for suspicion the driver had a suspended DL because of a computer check. Defendant was made to get out of the vehicle despite being blind. The officer noted marijuana flakes on his … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, State constitution, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH6: Because OH limits minor misdemeanor searches more than the 4A, search of def because of marijuana flakes on shirt was unreasonable

OH5: Fire inspector’s violation of city agreement to give notice before inspections warranted his firing

Jeffries complained that he was subjected to arbitrary and invasive fire inspections, and the city agreed to give him prior notice. Lanzer, however, violated that agreement and was fired by the city. “However, as stated above, the City of Louisville … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH5: Fire inspector’s violation of city agreement to give notice before inspections warranted his firing

MD: Trial court erred in suppressing virtual replay of Wardlow

Officers approached a group of men on the street in a high crime area telling them to stay put and not run. Defendant, however, sprinted away. Two officers were on bikes and caught up to him, and he admitted he … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: Trial court erred in suppressing virtual replay of Wardlow

CA7: RS of drugs in a backpack was justification for frisk for gun; taking key to do a protective sweep of apt before seeking consent was valid on this record

Defendant’s frisk for weapons was justified because there was reasonable suspicion he had drugs in a backpack that had been deposited in an apartment, which defendant lied about going to. Drugs and firearms “go hand in hand,” (See, e.g., United … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: RS of drugs in a backpack was justification for frisk for gun; taking key to do a protective sweep of apt before seeking consent was valid on this record