Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

S.D.N.Y.: Failure to challenge CSLI before Carpenter wasn’t IAC

Defendant’s verdict was the day Carpenter was decided, and his defense lawyer hadn’t challenged the CSLI before that. Defense lawyers don’t have to forecast changes in the law. “ Even following Carpenter, the Second Circuit has declined to suppress cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Failure to challenge CSLI before Carpenter wasn’t IAC

D.D.C.: Def’s 4A IAC claim fails because he can’t show he’d prevail on merits of search

Defendant can’t show that his Fourth Amendment claim would have succeeded on the seizure of evidence from a car for IAC purposes. “Here, Miller, having focused almost exclusively on standing to the exclusion of the remainder of his burden, cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Def’s 4A IAC claim fails because he can’t show he’d prevail on merits of search

CA9: Court can’t order return of property govt doesn’t have

Defendant can’t get an order for return of property where he can’t show that the government even has it. United States v. Tziu-Uc, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 34105 (9th Cir. Dec. 4, 2018). Self-represented defendant claimed ineffective assistance of counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Court can’t order return of property govt doesn’t have

PA: GPS tracker and audio recorder worn by CI for safety reasons not prohibited by Jones or 4A

The CI had a recorder and GPS tracking device placed on him for his safety while he was riding with the defendant. This is not a “tracking device” under state statute or Jones because it wasn’t planted on defendant’s property, … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on PA: GPS tracker and audio recorder worn by CI for safety reasons not prohibited by Jones or 4A

CA10: A notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes

Giving plaintiff a notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes. Leon v. Summit County, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 33349 (10th Cir. Nov. 28, 2018). The information from the CI was detailed, down to a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: A notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes

KS: Searching purse of driver taken away by ambulance from a car wreck was unreasonable

Police conducted an unreasonable warrantless search of defendant’s purse for her DL when she was taken from the scene of an accident by ambulance. No exception to the warrant requirement applies. State v. Evans, 2018 Kan. LEXIS 580 (Nov. 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on KS: Searching purse of driver taken away by ambulance from a car wreck was unreasonable

Three 2255s alleging IAC for no motion to suppress fail

One of defendant’s 2255 claims was that defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress when he doesn’t allege anything about it and he plead guilty. Pullu v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197809 (S.D. Fla. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Three 2255s alleging IAC for no motion to suppress fail

D.Ariz.: Search of car on curtilage fails under Collins

The search of defendant’s car ostensibly under the automobile exception fails under Collins v. Virginia. It was clearly on the curtilage, and the exclusionary rule is applied. United States v. Bautista, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197792 (D. Ariz. Nov. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Search of car on curtilage fails under Collins

S.D.Fla.: Govt oversearched and violated A-C privilege; but it wasn’t really bad enough to warrant sanctions, and govt not using it

The government reviewed attorney-client materials and failed to uphold the standards of DOJ to protect them from review by investigators. Nevertheless, it doesn’t rise high enough to require dismissal of the indictment. The government concedes that it won’t use some … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Overseizure, Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Govt oversearched and violated A-C privilege; but it wasn’t really bad enough to warrant sanctions, and govt not using it

S.D.Fla.: Co-def’s winning suppression motion shows IAC for this defendant

Defendant satisfied his burden of proof that defense counsel was ineffective because his codefendant prevailed on his motion to suppress. If he’d timely moved to set aside the plea it would have almost certainly been granted. Perez v. United States, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Co-def’s winning suppression motion shows IAC for this defendant

FL1: Def’s car search outside his chain link fence was outside the curtilage

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, but he made it to his mobile home and parked outside the chain link fence. The court finds the car was outside the curtilage under Dunn when the stop and dog sniff occurred. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL1: Def’s car search outside his chain link fence was outside the curtilage

S.D.Tex.: Carpenter applies to a 2015 CSLI application because the case is still pending

Carpenter applies to defendant’s CSLI because his case is still pending despite the fact the CSLI was obtained in 2015. Suppressed. United States v. Beverly, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183539 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2018). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Carpenter applies to a 2015 CSLI application because the case is still pending

CA10: In a Carpenter remand, court remands to Dist.Ct. instead of applying GFE

This case was GVR’d after Carpenter, and the court remands to the district court to make further findings. United States v. Thompson, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 29949 (10th Cir. Oct. 24, 2018). Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not filing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA10: In a Carpenter remand, court remands to Dist.Ct. instead of applying GFE

ME: First blood draw was potentially contaminated, so second was valid under exigent circumstances

The state showed by a preponderance of the evidence that there were exigent circumstances for a warrantless blood draw. Natural dissipation of alcohol alone is not an exigency under McNealy. The first blood draw was potentially contaminated, so a second … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on ME: First blood draw was potentially contaminated, so second was valid under exigent circumstances

W.D.Va.: Def counsel’s decision not to pursue a motion to suppress was reasonable and designed to prevent superseding indictment with higher MM

Defense counsel’s decision not to pursue a motion to suppress was reasonable under the circumstances. Defendant was already facing a 60 month minimum. The government made clear that they had additional counts they could bring but wouldn’t if the defense … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Def counsel’s decision not to pursue a motion to suppress was reasonable and designed to prevent superseding indictment with higher MM

N.D.Ind.: Court can’t exclude for knock-and-announce failure

Failure to properly knock-and-announce is foreclosed as a reason for exclusion under Hudson v. Michigan. United States v. Calligan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173193 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 9, 2018). 2255 petitioner was not prejudiced by defense counsel’s failure to challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Knock and announce, Overseizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Court can’t exclude for knock-and-announce failure

TX: No IAC for def counsel not forecasting change in 4A law

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not forecasting McNeeley before defendant’s guilty plea. “When a defendant waives the right to have a jury determine guilt or innocence and admits or does not contest guilt, the defendant does so under the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX: No IAC for def counsel not forecasting change in 4A law

CA7: In a wiretap application, only def’s nickname was sufficient when PC is shown

Defendant on a wiretap application was only known by his nickname, and this did nothing to alter the probable cause analysis nor undermine probable cause. United States v. Santiago, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 27919 (7th Cir. Oct. 2, 2018) (there’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA7: In a wiretap application, only def’s nickname was sufficient when PC is shown

CA11: Not calling def at suppression hearing was [a founded] strategy decision

Defense counsel’s decision not to call the defendant or other witnesses at a suppression hearing was a strategy decision not subject to second guessing except in extraordinary circumstances. Defense counsel concluded they lacked credibility. Here, defendant testified at trial to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Not calling def at suppression hearing was [a founded] strategy decision

S.D.Ga.: Being bumped by a police car and fleeing three more miles wasn’t a seizure

Defendant wasn’t seized by being bumped by police car because he went another three miles without stopping. “Moreover, the Eleventh Circuit and courts across different circuits have concluded that no seizure occurs where police attempt to stop a fleeing vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Being bumped by a police car and fleeing three more miles wasn’t a seizure