Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

CA11: No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search

No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search. [The court alludes to what might possibly be some factual justification but doesn’t say that it was.] Watkins v. Pinnock, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1881 (11th Cir. Jan. 22, 2020). … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search

CA4: RS is the standard for a prison visitor strip search

Reasonable suspicion is the standard for a prison visitor strip search, and officers had reasonable suspicion here. Calloway v. Lokey, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1756 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2020):

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: RS is the standard for a prison visitor strip search

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails by RJ Vogt:

Posted in E-mail, Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

D.Minn.: Actual knowledge of jail calls being recorded isn’t required because of inmate handbook, signs on wall, and the sounds on the phone call

Testimony of actual knowledge that non-attorney jail calls would be recorded isn’t required. The inmate handbook, signs by the jail phone, and a notice in the call itself tell inmates that. United States v. Strother, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6185 … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Actual knowledge of jail calls being recorded isn’t required because of inmate handbook, signs on wall, and the sounds on the phone call

CT: No REP in jail letter to def’s mother with admission

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights weren’t violated by corrections officers copying a letter to his mother with an admission then turning it over to law enforcement officers. He had no privacy interest in his mail that society would recognize. The claim … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CT: No REP in jail letter to def’s mother with admission

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails by RJ Vogt:

Posted in E-mail, Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

S.D.Ohio: Lack of factual basis for stop deprives state of Heien mistake of law argument

The video from the patrol car doesn’t support the officer’s claim that defendant didn’t properly stop at a stop sign that that was the basis for the stop. The court doesn’t find Heien applies because this isn’t a mistake of … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Lack of factual basis for stop deprives state of Heien mistake of law argument

D.C.Cir.: Dewey and Mine Safety Act provide for no precompliance warning or review before inspection

The petitioner here was a contractor working at a mine, and a mine safety inspector looked at equipment and cited the contractor a $116 fine. The ALJ denied relief, and, on a petition for review of the fine, the court … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Dewey and Mine Safety Act provide for no precompliance warning or review before inspection

NYTimes: Strip-Searching of 8-Year-Old at Prison Leads Virginia to Halt the Practice

NYTimes: Strip-Searching of 8-Year-Old at Prison Leads Virginia to Halt the Practice (“Gov. Ralph Northam suspended the policy after a girl was strip-searched while trying to visit her father.”) And I lost a case similar to this about 18 years … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on NYTimes: Strip-Searching of 8-Year-Old at Prison Leads Virginia to Halt the Practice

CA6: Alleged violation of discovery order by unauthorized possession of Jencks material justifies search of jail cell, not that there’s a REP in it anyway

Alleged violation of a protective order on discovery authorized a search of defendant’s jail cell and a search warrant for his mother’s home after he mailed it to her to copy and disseminate. The protective order itself justified the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA6: Alleged violation of discovery order by unauthorized possession of Jencks material justifies search of jail cell, not that there’s a REP in it anyway

Courthouse News Service: False Drug Test Results Blamed for Jailhouse Punishments

Courthouse News Service: False Drug Test Results Blamed for Jailhouse Punishments by Amanda Ottaway (“According to the complaint, DOCCS is currently in the process of overturning all positive results generated by the faulty tests, which it says are the result … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: False Drug Test Results Blamed for Jailhouse Punishments

MA: Calls from juvenile detention have no REP

Phone calls in juvenile detention were properly recorded. Defendant was on notice of recording. Commonwealth v. Odgren, 483 Mass. 41 (Sept. 4, 2019). In an immigration case where the petitioner bears the burden of showing an egregious violation of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Immigration arrests, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on MA: Calls from juvenile detention have no REP

ND: Pole camera surveillance caught def frequenting a trailer park known for drug sales; he was stopped there with RS

Reasonable suspicion existed to detain defendant for coming into a trailer park known for its drug sales. Police had a pole camera set up recording comings and goings, and defendant had been there multiple times before. On the totality of … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: Pole camera surveillance caught def frequenting a trailer park known for drug sales; he was stopped there with RS

NY2: Jail call to codefendant from Rikers was admissible

Defendant was in Rikers and called his codefendant. The calls were admissible and were not the product of an unreasonable search because he was warned of the recording. People v. Boyd, 2019 NY Slip Op 06219, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY2: Jail call to codefendant from Rikers was admissible

S.D.N.Y.: Govt subpoena to photograph gang tattoos of incarcerated def not violation of 4A or 5A

The government seeks a subpoena to photograph defendant’s tattoos in an effort to corroborate gang membership. The motion to suppress is denied. “The Court is persuaded that the Government search contemplated by the description in the August 7 Letter is … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Govt subpoena to photograph gang tattoos of incarcerated def not violation of 4A or 5A

D.Kan.: USAO in Kansas in contempt for handling litigation over recording attorney-client jail calls

Not a Fourth Amendment case at this point of the litigation, but extremely interesting to everybody in the criminal justice system, including jailers, is United States v. Carter, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137728 (D. Kan. Aug. 13, 2019), where there … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on D.Kan.: USAO in Kansas in contempt for handling litigation over recording attorney-client jail calls

M.D.Fla.: When the automobile exception applies and def is in custody, a SW still isn’t required

There was probable cause by a plain view so the automobile exception applies. The fact defendant as in custody doesn’t require a search warrant. United States v. Lightsey, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121669 (M.D. Fla. July 3, 2019). There was … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: When the automobile exception applies and def is in custody, a SW still isn’t required

CA7 declines to reinstate a 4A jail strip search claim after 8A claim went to trial; SCOTUS needs to decide

Plaintiff female prisoners filed a Fourth Amendment and Eighth Amendment claim against a jail for what they alleged was an invasion of privacy by an unjustified group strip search. The district court granted summary judgment against them on the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA7 declines to reinstate a 4A jail strip search claim after 8A claim went to trial; SCOTUS needs to decide

D.Md.: No REP in jail calls even though warning was in English and def didn’t speak English

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in jail calls to nonlawyers. The government didn’t show that defendants could even understand the warning in English on the phone, but it doesn’t matter. United States v. Reyes-Canales, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Md.: No REP in jail calls even though warning was in English and def didn’t speak English

TheAppeal.org: ‘Do Not Record’

TheAppeal.org: ‘Do Not Record’ by Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg: Phone calls between prisoners in Orange County and their lawyers were recorded and accessed. How wide the eavesdropping was remains an open question. . . .

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on TheAppeal.org: ‘Do Not Record’