Category Archives: Good faith exception

N.D.Ga.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under GFE

Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under Davis good faith exception. United States v. Hearst, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126005 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 2018), adopted 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125791 (N.D. Ga. July 27, 2018). The search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under GFE

CA8: SW for search of def’s person wasn’t particular, but there was a reference to the affidavit; GFE applies

The search warrant to search defendant’s person for things wasn’t particular, but the good faith exception applies. It referred to the affidavit which wasn’t present, but they remembered it. The search warrant wasn’t so deficient that it could not be … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on CA8: SW for search of def’s person wasn’t particular, but there was a reference to the affidavit; GFE applies

TN: Failure to leave copy of SW mere technical error

Defendant had her blood drawn by search warrant, and the officer failed to leave a copy of the warrant with her. The trial court granted her motion to suppress, and the court of criminal appeals affirmed. Reversed: The mere nonprejudicial … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: Failure to leave copy of SW mere technical error

CA9: Def shows issuing magistrate on arrest warrant wasn’t neutral and detached, but he still loses to GFE

The Ninth Circuit recognizes judicial abandonment under the neutral and detached magistrate requirement, but defendant here still loses. The officers arresting him on the warrant weren’t there when the judicial officer failed to read the papers, and they had no … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on CA9: Def shows issuing magistrate on arrest warrant wasn’t neutral and detached, but he still loses to GFE

S.D.Ind.: CSLI search two years before Carpenter was valid under GFE

The Seventh Circuit held in dicta in 2014 that CSLI didn’t need a warrant. United States v. Thousand, 558 Fed. Appx. 666, 670 (7th Cir. 2014). The search here was two years before Carpenter. Davis good faith applies, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: CSLI search two years before Carpenter was valid under GFE

NMCCA: Despite lack of PC for search authorization, GFE applies because everybody thought there was PC

Defendant service member had sex with another service member, allegedly taking pictures and videos of her. Then he allegedly tried to extort her over the pictures, which she reported. A search authorization was issued for defendant’s on base housing to … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on NMCCA: Despite lack of PC for search authorization, GFE applies because everybody thought there was PC

WI: SI to arrest warrant issued in error but relied on in good faith would not be suppressed

Police were dispatched to a 911 call, and, on the way, discovered an arrest warrant for the subject of the call. By the time they got there, the 911 call was off, but they arrested on the warrant. It turned … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WI: SI to arrest warrant issued in error but relied on in good faith would not be suppressed

CA9: PC is a close question, and that’s good enough for GFE

“In this case, it is a close question whether the warrant was supported by probable cause. Although a close call, we need not resolve this issue because even if the warrant lacked probable cause, the good faith exception to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: PC is a close question, and that’s good enough for GFE

CA4: Carpenter didn’t apply under Davis GFE where circuit law didn’t require warrant before

Carpenter doesn’t apply under Davis good faith exception where circuit law didn’t require a warrant before. Besides, here it was harmless at best. United States v. Chavez, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 18022 (4th Cir. July 2, 2018):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Carpenter didn’t apply under Davis GFE where circuit law didn’t require warrant before

M.D.N.C.: Calling def a “suspect” in the affidavit for SW for his house, without more, isn’t PC and the GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant was identified as a “suspect” in a shooting, but the police provided nothing to the issuing magistrate that even suggested how. The affidavit for the search warrant of defendant’s home was “bare bones,” and the good faith exception can’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: Calling def a “suspect” in the affidavit for SW for his house, without more, isn’t PC and the GFE doesn’t apply

CA6: SW affidavit was so lacking in evidence that it did not show PC; def’s criminal record not enough; SW affidavit so lacking, no GFE

To determine whether the warrant affidavit supported probable cause to search defendant’s residence under Fourth Amendment, the court was required to assess the significance of each piece of evidence relied upon. Then it considers all the evidence together to determine … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: SW affidavit was so lacking in evidence that it did not show PC; def’s criminal record not enough; SW affidavit so lacking, no GFE

CA8: Prior unlawful search of bag on bus was corrected by good faith actions of officer and exclusionary rule wouldn’t be applied

A Tornado bus was stopped in Arkansas, and the Arkansas State Trooper was looking for unmarked bags that could be considered abandoned because unmarked bags on Tornado buses were being used to ferry drugs. While searching the bag, the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8: Prior unlawful search of bag on bus was corrected by good faith actions of officer and exclusionary rule wouldn’t be applied

NE: A pre-Birchfield warrantless blood draw would not be excluded under GFE

A blood draw that predated Birchfield was valid under the good faith exception. “Because the good faith exception applies, the district court erred in reversing Hatfield’s conviction.” State v. Hatfield, 300 Neb. 152 (June 8, 2018). Two controlled buys by … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on NE: A pre-Birchfield warrantless blood draw would not be excluded under GFE

NJ: “Hot pursuit” into a home to seek an iPhone via the find phone application was unreasonable

“Hot pursuit” into a home to seek an iPhone via the find phone application was unreasonable. Here, however, there was a private search by defendant’s brother, and the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply. State ex rel. J.A., 2018 N.J. LEXIS 713 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Hot pursuit, Nexus | Comments Off on NJ: “Hot pursuit” into a home to seek an iPhone via the find phone application was unreasonable

D.S.C.: Cut and paste “clerical error” on address of place to be searched was overcome by GFE

Officers sought a search warrant for defendant’s house at 2681 Houston Street. The search warrant itself, obviously called up on a computer from another case, had 3438 Navajo Street, and nobody noticed the difference, including the judge who reviewed the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Cut and paste “clerical error” on address of place to be searched was overcome by GFE

M.D.Tenn.: SW affidavit didn’t sufficiently show nexus, but not so lacking that GFE didn’t apply

The affidavit for the search warrant here failed to show nexus to defendant’s house under Sixth Circuit precedent. It was sufficient, however, for the good faith exception to apply because the affidavit was not so lacking in information that reliance … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: SW affidavit didn’t sufficiently show nexus, but not so lacking that GFE didn’t apply

CA5: When govt addresses GFE, defendant must respond or waive it

In the Fifth Circuit it’s good faith first, probable cause second. The government addressed good faith in its brief, but defendant didn’t in his. Good faith prevails. United States v. Carroll, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 12280 (5th Cir. May 10, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: When govt addresses GFE, defendant must respond or waive it

CA4: Forensic border search of cell phone “non-routine” but GFE applies

An intensive forensic search of an outbound noncitizen’s cell phone required at least reasonable suspicion and maybe a warrant under Riley. Case law, however, uniformly says not at the time this happened, so the search is valid under the good … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Forensic border search of cell phone “non-routine” but GFE applies

CA4: It’s a reasonable inference that evidence of bank fraud will be found at home

It is a reasonable inference that records of bank fraud would be found in defendant’s home because it is usually kept for many years. The officer stated this in the affidavit for the search warrant as based on his experience, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA4: It’s a reasonable inference that evidence of bank fraud will be found at home

D.N.J.: Previous finding of good faith applies to later Franks challenge

Defendant had already filed a suppression motion and lost on good faith. Now he files a motion based on Franks that statements of witnesses in quote marks weren’t accurate. The previous finding of good faith carries over to here, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Previous finding of good faith applies to later Franks challenge