NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying. (This is after a remand for a probable cause finding. The court also discusses the good faith exception and the court must guard against the exception swallowing the exclusionary rule.) State v. Julius, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 86 (Feb. 4, 2026) (2-1).

The court of appeals cursorily finds the stop valid and then a consent to a dog sniff and then search. State v. Thompson, 2026-Ohio-398 (11th Dist. Feb. 9, 2026).*

There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for alleged crimes he wasn’t convicted of, so he doesn’t state a claim. Hughes v. District of Columbia, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26586 (D.D.C. Feb. 9, 2026).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.