D.Colo.: Prospective relief against judge authorized administrative warrants denied

Plaintiff was the subject of an administrative warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. The request for prospective relief is denied, and the complaint is dismissed. Waldrop v. Colo. Dep’t of Agric., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27532 (D. Colo. Feb. 10, 2026).

“[T]he Court concludes that Detective Jimmy Welsh made reckless omissions in his application for a search warrant, but even so, the warrant still would have been issued if the omissions were added back in.” United States v. McCullough, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26402 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 9, 2026).*

Plaintiff was the subject of a search that led to his guilty plea and conviction. He can’t sue over that now. Gray v. Goddu, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27080 (D. Conn. Feb. 10, 2026).*

There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest. He had similar tattoos as shown on the suspect in the surveillance videos. United States v. Trujillo, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27091 (D.N.M. Feb. 10, 2026).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.