Daily Archives: February 13, 2024

E.D.N.C.: The third-party doctrine is information about records, not content

Third party information: “This type of information is unprotected by the Fourth Amendment. See Smith, 442 U.S. at 742. Courts routinely recognize that under Smith’s logic as applied to these statutes, this type of information constitutes communication records, not content.” … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Overseizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: The third-party doctrine is information about records, not content

VA: SW affidavit not admissible in a civil dispute where it contained multiple levels of hearsay

In a civil dispute over a condo, one party sought to use a search warrant affidavit as evidence, and they filed a motion in limine. The trial judge first denied it, then sua sponte granted it as the trial started. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on VA: SW affidavit not admissible in a civil dispute where it contained multiple levels of hearsay

OH3: 9-1-1 call about possible fire in def’s home justified FD entry; plain view resulted.

A 9-1-1 call about a fire in defendant’s home revealed by heavy black smoke from the chimney brought the fire and police departments who entered. The fire scene entry and the plain view were reasonable under Michigan v. Tyler. State … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on OH3: 9-1-1 call about possible fire in def’s home justified FD entry; plain view resulted.

D.N.M.: Accidental finding of A-C communications in cell phone search was not intentional and did not compromise defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel

Defendant’s Apple cell phone was searched with a warrant, and the contents were shared with defense counsel even before the government completed its own review. It was discovered that there were attorney-client communications on the phone, and the government immediately … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Taint team | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Accidental finding of A-C communications in cell phone search was not intentional and did not compromise defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel