Daily Archives: November 2, 2020

CA8: If officers “lingered” during protective sweep, nothing else was found as a result

Defendant complained that the officers “lingered” during the protective sweep. Even if they did, nothing else was found as a result. United States v. Crutchfield, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 34446 (8th Cir. Nov. 2, 2020). The driver of the car … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA8: If officers “lingered” during protective sweep, nothing else was found as a result

NE: Search of passenger’s purse by consent for passenger compartment was based on reasonable belief it was passenger’s

The driver consented to a search of the car defendant was a passenger in. The passenger’s purse was reasonably believed to be the driver’s for consent purposes, even though it was on her side. When it was opened and her … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on NE: Search of passenger’s purse by consent for passenger compartment was based on reasonable belief it was passenger’s

CA6: Lies told during probation search help form RS

Defendant denied he lived in the house where the police conducted a probation search. His standing was challenged, but the merits were decided. They suspected him of being involved in drug dealing and went to talk to him and his … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA6: Lies told during probation search help form RS

E.D.Va.: A Terry stop can’t be used to investigate a completed misdemeanor (noting conflicting authorities)

This anonymous tip fails under Navarette because it permits stops on no reliable information at all. Moreover, a Terry stop cannot be used to investigate a completed misdemeanor (noting the circuits to the contrary). United States v. Beasley, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: A Terry stop can’t be used to investigate a completed misdemeanor (noting conflicting authorities)

D.Mass.: Def accidentally lost his fanny pack in flight; court finds abandonment even though he didn’t intend it

The court finds defendant abandoned his fanny pack which he said was strapped over his chest and fell off during flight from the police. He testified he didn’t intentionally drop the fanny pack, and it must have slipped off while … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def accidentally lost his fanny pack in flight; court finds abandonment even though he didn’t intend it