Daily Archives: November 26, 2020

CA9: Mid-trial change in testimony from SW affidavit may entitle def to Franks hearing, but here issue wasn’t timely raised

Without deciding whether to follow the Fourth Circuit (United States v. White, 850 F.3d 667, 673 (4th Cir. 2017)) holding that trial testimony differing from a search warrant affidavit entitles the defendant to a mid-trial Franks hearing, here the issue … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: Mid-trial change in testimony from SW affidavit may entitle def to Franks hearing, but here issue wasn’t timely raised

DE: Investigating witness tampering justified SDT for jail calls

The AG subpoenaed jail calls, which defendant concedes could be recorded and that he had no privacy in. His argument here is whether there was a “substantial governmental interest in obtaining the prison phone records.” The state counters that they … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on DE: Investigating witness tampering justified SDT for jail calls

W.D.Wis.: Beware trying to impose Riley on a mere civil discovery request

“Equating a suspected drug trafficker’s assertion of a Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in his cell phone with plaintiffs’ discovery requests in this case wastes everybody’s time.” Driftless Area Land Conservatory v. Huebsch, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218934 (W.D. Wis. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Beware trying to impose Riley on a mere civil discovery request