Monthly Archives: December 2018

IN: A search waiver condition “without a warrant and without probable cause” still requires RS

A search waiver condition “without a warrant and without probable cause” still requires reasonable suspicion. Jarman v. State, 2018 Ind. App. LEXIS 445 (Nov. 30, 2018). Window tinting that covered the back window brake light was a traffic violation justifying … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: A search waiver condition “without a warrant and without probable cause” still requires RS

NE: For Rodriguez purposes, it doesn’t matter that the stop was at a gas station and not on the side of the road

Defendant’s reasonable detention pre-dog sniff was at a gas station and not on the side of the road. That doesn’t change the constitutional calculus. State v. Ferguson, 301 Neb. 697 (Nov. 30, 2018). “Here, the Court finds the warrant described … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: For Rodriguez purposes, it doesn’t matter that the stop was at a gas station and not on the side of the road

Paul Ohm, The Many Revolutions of Carpenter

Paul Ohm, The Many Revolutions of Carpenter, 32 Harv. J.L. & Tech. ___ (2O019) (forthcoming). Abstract:

Posted in Informational privacy | Comments Off on Paul Ohm, The Many Revolutions of Carpenter

NH: Request to consult with counsel doesn’t weigh against finding voluntary consent

Defendant’s consent was voluntary on the totality. “There is no evidence that the detectives coerced the defendant into signing the consent form and the defendant offered no evidence to the trial court that conflicted with Lombardi’s testimony regarding the facts … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NH: Request to consult with counsel doesn’t weigh against finding voluntary consent

E.D.N.C.: Trial objection was 5A and Miranda; 4A claim waived and can’t be raised post-trial

Defendant’s trial objection was based on Miranda and the Fifth Amendment. No Fourth Amendment claim was made so it is waived and post trial briefing is too late. United States v. Horton, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201898 (E.D. N.C. Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Trial objection was 5A and Miranda; 4A claim waived and can’t be raised post-trial

CA9: Police get a 911 call that def is yelling and threatening somebody in house; exigency based entry justified after talking to him

Police get a 911 call that a man was yelling and screaming at and threatening somebody, and they come to the house. At the door, defendant admits that he was because he was stressed out about “issues.” He also admitted … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Police get a 911 call that def is yelling and threatening somebody in house; exigency based entry justified after talking to him

IN: Female CI doing a controlled buy is allegedly digitally penetrated by def looking for recorder, and he’s charged with rape

No search issue here; just a cautionary tale for police: A female CI came in for a controlled buy on defendant. He feared she was wired and made her strip to her underwear, and she did. Then he told her … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IN: Female CI doing a controlled buy is allegedly digitally penetrated by def looking for recorder, and he’s charged with rape

CA10: A notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes

Giving plaintiff a notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes. Leon v. Summit County, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 33349 (10th Cir. Nov. 28, 2018). The information from the CI was detailed, down to a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: A notice to appear in court is not a seizure for false arrest purposes