Daily Archives: June 28, 2016

CA8: Affidavit only referred to CI as “reliable,” and the affiant could have said more but didn’t; PC on totality

The affidavit for a GPS warrant only referred to the CI as “reliable,” and the affiant could have said more but didn’t. Still, the officer did do things to try to corroborate without elaborating. On the totality, probable cause was … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA8: Affidavit only referred to CI as “reliable,” and the affiant could have said more but didn’t; PC on totality

CA9: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases, joining other circuits. Lingo v. City of Salem, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11708 (9th Cir. June 27, 2016) (amended Aug. 8, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA9: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

Verdict: A Potential Landmine in Waiting in Utah v. Strieff

Verdict: A Potential Landmine in Waiting in Utah v. Strieff by Sherry F. Colb:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Verdict: A Potential Landmine in Waiting in Utah v. Strieff

ID: Shoplifting stop didn’t justify a frisk

Defendant was stopped out in the parking lot of a store as an alleged accessory to shoplifting. The stop was with reasonable suspicion, but the frisk for weapons was not. Heroin was found in his pocket, and it is suppressed. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ID: Shoplifting stop didn’t justify a frisk

CA5: Roving Border Patrol stop satisfied Brignoni-Ponce standard

“In determining reasonable suspicion in the context of roving Border Patrol stops, courts examine the totality of the circumstances, including the factors enunciated in Brignoni-Ponce. … These are (1) the area’s proximity to the border; (2) the characteristics of the … Continue reading

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on CA5: Roving Border Patrol stop satisfied Brignoni-Ponce standard