Daily Archives: June 4, 2016

S.D.Fla.: One isn’t “seized” just because a law enforcement officer walked up to him

Defendant was not “seized” just because a police officer got out of a car and walked up to him and his cohorts. The fact nobody moved isn’t a seizure. Then, a plain view of drugs and a gun occurred, and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: One isn’t “seized” just because a law enforcement officer walked up to him

D.P.R.: Under Payton, there’s a difference between where an arrestee “could be found” and “would be found”

Just because PRPD had two addresses for defendant as places he’d lived before didn’t give reason to believe he was there at the time they entered with an arrest warrant. That it “could be” a place he’d be found doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Under Payton, there’s a difference between where an arrestee “could be found” and “would be found”

TX13: Suspending a DL for refusal of a blood test doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment

Suspending a DL for refusal of a blood test doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Rankin v. Tex. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 5785 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburg June 2, 2016)*:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on TX13: Suspending a DL for refusal of a blood test doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment