Daily Archives: June 30, 2016

EFF: Racial Bias and Arrest Tech

EFF: Racial Bias and Arrest Tech by Jennifer Lynch and Adam Schwartz: Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court took away a little more of your right to be free from unlawful police searches. In a 5-3 decision in Utah v. … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on EFF: Racial Bias and Arrest Tech

S.D.Tex.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest was valid

“Here, the seizure of Fulton’s cell phone during his arrest fell squarely within the exception articulated in Chimel and Robinson as a seizure incident to arrest.” United States v. Fulton, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83014 (S.D.Tex. June 23, 2016). The … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest was valid

Baltimore Sun: Baltimore Police institute new ‘use of force’ policy for officers as Justice Department report looms

Baltimore Sun: Baltimore Police institute new ‘use of force’ policy for officers as Justice Department report looms by Kevin Rector: The Baltimore Police Department plans to implement a new use-of-force policy Friday that emphasizes the “sanctity of life,” stresses de-escalation … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Baltimore Sun: Baltimore Police institute new ‘use of force’ policy for officers as Justice Department report looms

D.Minn.: USDJ’s job is to adopt R&R when the proof is in dispute

When there are two views of the suppression evidence before the USMJ that are plausible, it’s not the USDJ’s job to reject the R&R but adopt it. United States v. Hull, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83877 (D.Minn. June 27, 2016)*:

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on D.Minn.: USDJ’s job is to adopt R&R when the proof is in dispute