Daily Archives: June 13, 2016

Today is the 50th Anniversary of Miranda v. Arizona

WaPo: The right to remain silent, brought to you by J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI by Richard Willing. Say what you will about Hoover, he knew from the FBI’s experience that warned suspects would still talk and their statements … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Today is the 50th Anniversary of Miranda v. Arizona

OH2: Stop was on a hunch and suppressed

Defendant was stopped for having 10 or more scrap tires on his truck which would have required special state registration. The photographs of the truck showed seven tires. The stop was based on a hunch and not reasonable suspicion. The … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Stop was on a hunch and suppressed

ND: CI’s info of def carrying meth on Amtrak was corroborated by its details proving otherwise true and another ongoing meth investigation

Defendant was the target of a methamphetamine investigation when DTF officers received information via a CI that she would be arriving on an Amtrak train from Washington State carrying meth. This was in addition to the original meth investigation. When … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: CI’s info of def carrying meth on Amtrak was corroborated by its details proving otherwise true and another ongoing meth investigation

E.D.N.Y.: Def got a suppression hearing and was directed to address standing; he didn’t show it

Defendant was stopped for erratic driving in Brooklyn and his car was driven by another officer to the precinct station where it was inventoried. In the order setting the hearing, the court directed defendant to better address his standing, and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def got a suppression hearing and was directed to address standing; he didn’t show it

D.Colo.: Rare proved Franks violation; suppression required because of intent; no severability of a SW after Franks violation

Defendant was a chiropractor being investigated for health fraud, and the investigators procured a search warrant for records. Defendant was the target of an administrative investigation that produced a settlement, an Admonition Letter, with no finding of fault or fraud. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Rare proved Franks violation; suppression required because of intent; no severability of a SW after Franks violation