Daily Archives: June 10, 2016

LA5: Video of stop supported consent despite the police reports

The trial court abused its discretion in suppressing a search because the officer’s report wasn’t a complete reflection of the video. The video shows defendant clearly consenting by agreeing to it and then opening the car door. State v. Jackson, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on LA5: Video of stop supported consent despite the police reports

DE: SW also for documents permitted seizure of a cell phone because nexus was shown; second warrant for contents of phone

Police were justified in entering defendant’s apartment without a warrant under the clothing exigency to retrieve clothing reasonably calculated to lessen the risk of injury to defendant, who was wearing only a t-shirt, underwear, and no shoes to go to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on DE: SW also for documents permitted seizure of a cell phone because nexus was shown; second warrant for contents of phone

The Daily Beast: DEA Wants Inside Your Medical Records to Fight the War on Drugs

The Daily Beast: DEA Wants Inside Your Medical Records to Fight the War on Drugs by Christopher Moraff: The feds are fighting to look at millions of private files without a warrant, including those of two transgender men who are … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Daily Beast: DEA Wants Inside Your Medical Records to Fight the War on Drugs

NE: Def is presumptively entitled to return of noncontraband property seized from him when his case is over

Defendant is presumptively entitled to return of noncontraband property seized from him when his case is over. “As in State v. Agee, supra, we conclude that once the criminal proceedings against Dubray were concluded, Dubray was presumptively entitled to the … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on NE: Def is presumptively entitled to return of noncontraband property seized from him when his case is over

NM: Inventory of def’s backpack many feet away from him was unreasonable, even though he admitted MJ was in it [Revd by NMSC]

Defendant on his motorcycle was followed by an officer because the officer knew that he didn’t have a valid driver’s license. He pulled into his driveway and parked behind his car and got off the bike, putting his backpack on … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on NM: Inventory of def’s backpack many feet away from him was unreasonable, even though he admitted MJ was in it [Revd by NMSC]

TX: Def’s failure to get trial court ruling on constitutional question was defaulted

The constitutional claim of the legality of defendant’s blood draw was argued, but the trial judge never ruled, so the claim wasn’t preserved for appeal. Court of Appeals reversed. Smith v. State, 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 89 (June 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on TX: Def’s failure to get trial court ruling on constitutional question was defaulted