OH2: Stop was on a hunch and suppressed

Defendant was stopped for having 10 or more scrap tires on his truck which would have required special state registration. The photographs of the truck showed seven tires. The stop was based on a hunch and not reasonable suspicion. The grant of the motion to suppress is affirmed. [Note: Heien and reasonable mistake of fact not discussed. Even so, was it a reasonable mistake of fact? Not in the court’s estimation.] State v. Palmer, 2016-Ohio-3359, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2240 (2d Dist. June 10, 2016).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion when he saw a Tahoe parked behind a school at night known for various illegal activities. He saw an adult and a juvenile in the car, and he walked up to it and saw defendant and the juvenile struggling to get dressed. On review of the R&R, the USDJ finds that the USMJ didn’t err in not reopening the hearing to take additional evidence for the defense because he didn’t show that it would attack the officers credibility, really the only issue. United States v. Milam, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73256 (W.D.Tenn. Mar. 18, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71555 (W.D. Tenn. June 1, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.