Daily Archives: March 3, 2015

Popular Science: Your DNA Can Now Be Used Against You in Court Without Your Consent [especially if you abandoned it]

Popular Science: Your DNA Can Now Be Used Against You in Court Without Your Consent By Lydia Ramsey A Recent Refusal by the Supreme Court Means That Involuntary DNA Collection Isn’t Unconstitutional Comment: No it doesn’t. This was DNA from … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Popular Science: Your DNA Can Now Be Used Against You in Court Without Your Consent [especially if you abandoned it]

WaPo: Justice review finds racial bias among Ferguson police

WaPo: Justice review finds racial bias among Ferguson police by Sari Horwitz: The Justice Department will issue findings this week that accuse the police department in Ferguson, Mo., of racial bias and routinely violating the constitutional rights of citizens, including … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Police misconduct | Comments Off on WaPo: Justice review finds racial bias among Ferguson police

WAMU: A D.C. Man Walks Into A Police Station And Asks For Marijuana… And Gets It

WAMU: A D.C. Man Walks Into A Police Station And Asks For Marijuana… And Gets It by Martin Austermuhle: D.C. police often confiscate drugs during the course of searches and arrests, but now D.C. residents are legally allowed to ask … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WAMU: A D.C. Man Walks Into A Police Station And Asks For Marijuana… And Gets It

IN: Conditioning getting out of a vehicle during a traffic stop on a patdown was valid consent

Unless police have reasonable suspicion that a subject is armed and dangerous, they may generally conduct a pat-down for officer safety only with the subject’s voluntary consent. Here, Defendant asked to step out of his truck during a traffic stop, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Conditioning getting out of a vehicle during a traffic stop on a patdown was valid consent

N.D.N.Y.: Facially deficient motion to suppress is rejected on the merits

Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence and statements is deficient in what it alleges, so the court goes with the government’s version and denies the motion. United States v. Aleem, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182475 (N.D.N.Y. April 30, 2014). Officers had … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Facially deficient motion to suppress is rejected on the merits

CA2: Single incident of viewing CP on computer was not PC to believe CP on computer; GFE applies, however

A single access to child pornography from an IP address linked to defendant was not enough to find probable cause that the defendant had child pornography on the computer. The good faith exception, however, was sufficient to sustain the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Single incident of viewing CP on computer was not PC to believe CP on computer; GFE applies, however

SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks?

SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks? by Rory Little: Tuesday’s argument in City of Los Angeles v. Patel, a Fourth Amendment case, presents a particularly difficult example of a common Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks?

Chicago Tribune: Why Apple can afford to get all gooey-eyed over the Fourth Amendment

Chicago Tribune: Why Apple can afford to get all gooey-eyed over the Fourth Amendment by Justin Fox. The last paragraph: Don’t get me wrong. It’s pretty awesome that Apple’s business model allows its chief executive officer to be an outspoken … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Chicago Tribune: Why Apple can afford to get all gooey-eyed over the Fourth Amendment