Daily Archives: March 31, 2015

The automobile exception turned 90 this month. Thank you, Prohibition

We missed it: The automobile exception turned 90 years old on March 2. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) (7-2). The justification for the search was the Volstead Act (Prohibition) and the statutory authority given to Prohies to … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on The automobile exception turned 90 this month. Thank you, Prohibition

CA4: Failure to raise search issue on first appeal waived it for appeal after remand

Defendant’s conviction was previously reversed and remanded. On this second appeal, defendant raises a search issue that wasn’t in the first appeal. That issue is barred by the “mandate rule” that it had to be appealed the first time or … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Failure to raise search issue on first appeal waived it for appeal after remand

D.Nev.: No reasonable mistake of law where only case on point says no RS for stop

A Nevada statute proscribes things “upon” the windshield. Air fresheners hanging from the mirror don’t violate the statute. The only Ninth Circuit case involves an almost identical city code provision, and that court held that something hanging from the mirror … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No reasonable mistake of law where only case on point says no RS for stop

E.D.Mo.: Not knowing your address while walking “home” in a high crime area and pulling up pants because of likely weight of gun was RS

Walking alone at night in a high crime area [the ‘hood?] and pulling up pants strongly suggested defendant had a gun there in his pants. He was nervously looking at the police car. He said he was going home but … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Not knowing your address while walking “home” in a high crime area and pulling up pants because of likely weight of gun was RS