Category Archives: Cell phones

WSJ: Sealed Court Files Obscure Rise in Electronic Surveillance

WSJ: Sealed Court Files Obscure Rise in Electronic Surveillance by Jennifer Valentino-DeVries: Data obtained by The Wall Street Journal from the Justice Department and various federal district courts suggest that electronic-surveillance orders have increased over the past decade and that … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WSJ: Sealed Court Files Obscure Rise in Electronic Surveillance

news.gnom.es: Quantifying Privacy: A Week of Location Data May Be an “Unreasonable Search” & New Law Review Article: Mosaic Theory and Machine Learning

News Gnomes: Quantifying Privacy: A Week of Location Data May Be an “Unreasonable Search” When does the simple digital tracking of your location and movements — the GPS bleeps from most of our smartphones — start to be truly revealing? … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, GPS / Tracking Data, Informational privacy | Comments Off on news.gnom.es: Quantifying Privacy: A Week of Location Data May Be an “Unreasonable Search” & New Law Review Article: Mosaic Theory and Machine Learning

WaPo: Volokh: Answering Justice Alito’s question: What makes an expectation of privacy ‘reasonable’?

WaPo: Volokh: Answering Justice Alito’s question: What makes an expectation of privacy ‘reasonable’? by Orin Kerr: During the recent oral argument in United States v. Wurie, the pending cell phone search case, Justice Alito asked an important question about the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh: Answering Justice Alito’s question: What makes an expectation of privacy ‘reasonable’?

Politico: The Founding Fathers Would Have Protected Your Smartphone

Politico: The Founding Fathers Would Have Protected Your Smartphone by Sen. Rand Paul and Sen. Chris Coons: Privacy is a core American value. For 235 years, the Fourth Amendment has protected us from unwarranted searches of our personal belongings. All … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Politico: The Founding Fathers Would Have Protected Your Smartphone

WaPo: Updates on Magistrate Judge Facciola’s cases

WaPo: Updates on Magistrate Judge Facciola’s cases by Orin Kerr: I’ve blogged several times about Magistrate Judge Facciola’s recent opinions denying government applications for warrants and court orders involving digital evidence. Here are three updates for readers who are following … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on WaPo: Updates on Magistrate Judge Facciola’s cases

consitutioncenter.org: Warrantless Cellphone Searches At Center of Fourth Amendment Program At the National Constitution Center

consitutioncenter.org: Warrantless Cellphone Searches At Center of Fourth Amendment Program At the National Constitution Center: Philadelphia, PA (May 19, 2014) – Can the police search the digital contents of a cellphone without a warrant or does it violate the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on consitutioncenter.org: Warrantless Cellphone Searches At Center of Fourth Amendment Program At the National Constitution Center

BLT: Court: Privacy Outweighs Public Interest in Dispute Over Cell Tracking Records

BLT: Court: Privacy Outweighs Public Interest in Dispute Over Cell Tracking Records by Zoe Tillman: The public doesn’t have a right to information on criminal cases involving warrantless cell phone tracking if the defendant was acquitted or had their case … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informational privacy | Comments Off on BLT: Court: Privacy Outweighs Public Interest in Dispute Over Cell Tracking Records

E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

At worst, the officer’s omission of three things from the affidavit for search warrant was negligent, not reckless, and, even if the material was included, it doesn’t defeat the finding of probable cause. “Thus, because Mr. Simpson has failed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, E-mail, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

Grits for Breakfast: Virginia, Utah, require warrants for phone location data, Tennessee bill awaiting gov’s signature

Grits for Breakfast: Virginia, Utah, require warrants for phone location data, Tennessee bill awaiting gov’s signature: More states have approved legislation requiring law enforcement to obtain warrants to track cell-phone location data, measure that passed the Texas House last year … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informational privacy | Comments Off on Grits for Breakfast: Virginia, Utah, require warrants for phone location data, Tennessee bill awaiting gov’s signature

NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley

NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley by David E. Sanger: Nearly a year after the first disclosures about the National Security Agency’s surveillance practices at home and abroad, the agency is emerging … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, FISA, Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley

SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Limiting a search? Sure, but how?

SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Limiting a search? Sure, but how? by Lyle Denniston: Trying to imagine all of the things that an individual might keep stored on a cellphone, and trying to decide how much privacy – if any – each … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Limiting a search? Sure, but how?

Journal-Advocate (CO): Protections for e-data clear Senate committee

Journal-Advocate (CO): Protections for e-data clear Senate committee by Marianne Goodland: A resolution to add “electronic data” to the Colorado constitution’s equivalent of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution got unanimous support this week from a Senate committee. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, E-mail, Informational privacy | Comments Off on Journal-Advocate (CO): Protections for e-data clear Senate committee

D.Mass.: Court doesn’t believe officer smelled marijuana; car search of computer and cell phone suppressed

The district judge disbelieves that the officer smelled marijuana, and suppresses the search of defendant’s car. The officer felt something was up but couldn’t articulate it. Inevitable discovery by inventory fails because there was no true inventory–no inventory was produced. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Court doesn’t believe officer smelled marijuana; car search of computer and cell phone suppressed

SCOTUSblog: Argument preview: Police and cellphone privacy

SCOTUSblog: Argument preview: Police and cellphone privacy by Lyle Denniston: Next Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court will hold back-to-back, one-hour hearings on cases testing the authority of police to search the contents of cellphones they take from people they have … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SCOTUSblog: Argument preview: Police and cellphone privacy

WaPo: Low-level federal judges balking at law enforcement requests for electronic evidence

WaPo: Low-level federal judges balking at law enforcement requests for electronic evidence by Ann E. Marimow and Craig Timberg: Judges at the lowest levels of the federal judiciary are balking at sweeping requests by law enforcement officials for cellphone and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail, ECPA, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on WaPo: Low-level federal judges balking at law enforcement requests for electronic evidence

W.D.Mo.: Dog alert on an airplane PC for SW

Defendant was flying a small aircraft, and he diverted from the flight plan. Local police were alerted, and a dog sniff was made of the airplane. The police went to the hotel where defendant was staying to talk to him, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Dog alert on an airplane PC for SW

Reuters: Cell phone search case is easy call for Supreme Court

Reuters: Cell phone search case is easy call for Supreme Court by Jack Shafer: (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Reuters: Cell phone search case is easy call for Supreme Court

M.D.Tenn.: Warrantless seizure of text message from cell phone valid under GFE

Without a case in point, warrantless seizure of a text message from a cell phone which was Overt Act 8 in the indictment was not unreasonable under the good faith exception. Defendant relies on Wurie, which is from the First … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Warrantless seizure of text message from cell phone valid under GFE

WaPo: Volokh: Choosing between ‘never search’ and ‘sometimes search’ in the cell phone search cases

WaPo: Volokh: Choosing between ‘never search’ and ‘sometimes search’ in the cell phone search cases by Orin Kerr: This is the hardest issue that the Supreme Court must decide in trying to determine how the Fourth Amendment applies to search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh: Choosing between ‘never search’ and ‘sometimes search’ in the cell phone search cases

M.D.Pa.: Police recording the one side of a telephone conversation they could already hear did not implicate ECPA

Police recording the one side of a telephone conversation they could already hear did not implicate the Electronic Communications Privacy act. United States v. Ray, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49647 (M.D. Pa. April 10, 2014):

Posted in Cell phones, ECPA | Leave a comment