Category Archives: Burden of proof

TX14: Argument that arrest violated 4A wasn’t specific enough to preserve lack of PC

Arguing that one’s arrest violated the Fourth Amendment didn’t preserve his lack of probable cause claim on appeal. Doremus v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 7702 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Aug. 15, 2017). The affidavits in support of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Nexus | Comments Off on TX14: Argument that arrest violated 4A wasn’t specific enough to preserve lack of PC

OH2: Particularity and scope of search have to be raised and litigated to preserve for review

Claims of particularity and scope of search have to be raised and litigated in the trial court to appeal them. State v. Terrell, 2017-Ohio-7097, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3224 (2d Dist. Aug. 4, 2017). Tossing a gun in flight from … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof | Comments Off on OH2: Particularity and scope of search have to be raised and litigated to preserve for review

ME: SW not needed to photograph def’s facial injuries

Police didn’t need a search warrant to photograph injuries on defendant’s face. State v. McNaughton, 2017 ME 173, 2017 Me. LEXIS 193 (Aug. 1, 2017). There was neither reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop nor his patdown. No facts were put … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ME: SW not needed to photograph def’s facial injuries

OR: Three on preservation of search issues at the suppression hearing

Defendant preserved his argument that officer safety was not a valid justification in his memorandum of law, and that put the state and the trial court on notice that was an issue the state had to address, and didn’t. State … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof | Comments Off on OR: Three on preservation of search issues at the suppression hearing

NH: SW jurisdictional argument has to be presented to trial court first

Defendant’s jurisdictional argument that AOL’s emails were in Virginia and not amenable to a New Hampshire search warrant wasn’t presented to the trial court, so it’s waived. State v. Bergeron, 2017 N.H. LEXIS 143 (June 30, 2017). [Note: Jurisdiction of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NH: SW jurisdictional argument has to be presented to trial court first

M.D.Ala.: Supposition isn’t enough to discredit officer’s testimony about the stop

The court finds the officer’s testimony credible: “The court is likewise unpersuaded by the defendants’ arguments that Arwood’s testimony regarding the events of the day and his reason for stopping defendants’ vehicle lacks credibility. Defendants raise a litany of concerns … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Supposition isn’t enough to discredit officer’s testimony about the stop

NY4: Not granting a continuance of suppression hearing for unavailable witnesses was an abuse of discretion

The trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress for the nonattendance of its police witnesses after they were subpoenaed but didn’t show. The state sought an adjournment which the trial court denied. It was the first request for … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NY4: Not granting a continuance of suppression hearing for unavailable witnesses was an abuse of discretion

ND unconstitutionally shifts burden of proof to def to show she was not seized

A car with two passengers was pulled over for a headlight violaiton, and the driver gave a false name and had a warrant. She was arrested. A drug dog was called. The defendant passenger was free to leave at the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on ND unconstitutionally shifts burden of proof to def to show she was not seized

LA: “Defendant thus was in the difficult position of having to both distance himself from the barbeque grill, if he hoped to be found not guilty of possession of the cocaine found inside it, and tie himself more closely to the grill, if he hoped to obtain a favorable ruling on the motion to suppress. Trying to do both, he succeeded at neither.”

Showing a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched but denying possession is a fine line indeed. Show too much of an expectation of privacy just to challenge the search [always a risky proposition] and you might put yourself … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on LA: “Defendant thus was in the difficult position of having to both distance himself from the barbeque grill, if he hoped to be found not guilty of possession of the cocaine found inside it, and tie himself more closely to the grill, if he hoped to obtain a favorable ruling on the motion to suppress. Trying to do both, he succeeded at neither.”

GA: Std of review: If video clear, it controls on its facts and gets de novo review

Defendant was stopped for driving a motorcycle without a helmet, and alcohol was on his breath. The objective facts from the video show the FST and breath test were consensual. “And, where, as here, the controlling facts are undisputed because … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: Std of review: If video clear, it controls on its facts and gets de novo review

MT: Admission at a game checkpoint wasn’t “in custody”

Defendant was stopped at a game checkpoint and admitted to placing his daughter’s tag on a deer he shot. He was not “in custody” when he confessed. State v. Maile, 2017 MT 154, 2017 Mont. LEXIS 350 (June 23, 2017). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Roadblocks | Comments Off on MT: Admission at a game checkpoint wasn’t “in custody”

IA: Consent valid based on testimony despite bodycam not picking up voices

The bodycam didn’t pick up the officer’s voice, which is “troubling,” but the trial court credited the officers’ testimony defendant consented, and that’s enough to have to affirm on consent. State v. Klinger, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 633 (June 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Burden of proof | Comments Off on IA: Consent valid based on testimony despite bodycam not picking up voices

OH9: Potential working meth lab was exigency for entry

Officer’s seeing meth through window and then bottles used for making meth suggested making methamphetamine which is recognized as an exigency. State v. Secriskey, 2017-Ohio-4169, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2217 (9th Dist. June 7, 2017). Defendant gets limited discovery of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH9: Potential working meth lab was exigency for entry

MI: Search of def’s car was harmless compared to uncontested search of house

Even if the search of defendant’s car violated the Fourth Amendment, the uncontested search of his house did not, and that provides overwhelming evidence of guilt. Thus, the car search is harmless at best. Johnson v. State, 2017 Miss. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Probable cause | Comments Off on MI: Search of def’s car was harmless compared to uncontested search of house

E.D.Wis.: Gov’t didn’t show abandonment of package by sender because of error in address where recipient refused it

The USPS Postal Inspector did not act reasonably in determining that the package with methamphetamine was abandoned. The recipient disclaimed any interest in it, and the investigation into the sender, who would still have an interest in it, was woefully … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of proof | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Gov’t didn’t show abandonment of package by sender because of error in address where recipient refused it

M.D.Pa.: Def’s version in pro se motion to suppress used against him in third on credibility

Defendant files three motions to suppress. The first one was pro se and never mentioned that his stop was pretextual, that the headlights were actually on, and the stop was without reasonable suspicion. A later motion to suppress challenged the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def’s version in pro se motion to suppress used against him in third on credibility

WA: Implied consent law now includes testing for THC influenced driving, and it’s constitutional

The implied consent law includes testing for THC concentration, and it is constitutional. Kandler v. City of Kent, 2017 Wash. App. LEXIS 1176 (May 15, 2017). Officers adequately explained date discrepancies in the paperwork and use of a search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WA: Implied consent law now includes testing for THC influenced driving, and it’s constitutional

CA9: Where there are two grounds to support the search, appeal of only one means affirmance

There were two grounds on which defendant’s suppression motion could have been denied. The fact the court didn’t give defendant an opportunity to respond to one was a moot point. In addition, even if the motion had been granted, the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on CA9: Where there are two grounds to support the search, appeal of only one means affirmance

S.D.N.Y.: Issue preclusion: Same search litigated in NJ state courts in 2014 and def lost; can’t relitigate here. Besides, he’d lose on merits, too

Defendant was charged in New Jersey as a result of the same search as here. He fully litigated in state court and lost, and appealed and lost. That qualifies for issue preclusion in federal court in NYC because he had … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Issue preclusion: Same search litigated in NJ state courts in 2014 and def lost; can’t relitigate here. Besides, he’d lose on merits, too

TN: Police passing “no trespassing” signs on rural land doesn’t prevent a knock-and-talk

Citing numerous cases, the Tennessee Supreme Court holds that officers passing “no trespassing” signs has no talismanic authority to make a knock-and-talk unreasonable. The overwhelming weight of authority so holds. Police came to defendant’s front door, knocked, and he opened … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Knock and talk | Comments Off on TN: Police passing “no trespassing” signs on rural land doesn’t prevent a knock-and-talk