Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

OK: Officer’s excuse for extending the stop was pretext and violated Rodriguez

The officer’s claim that defendant’s log book wasn’t up to date was a mere pretext and subterfuge to unreasonably continue the stop in violation of Rodriguez. State v. Morgan, 2019 OK CR 26, 2019 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OK: Officer’s excuse for extending the stop was pretext and violated Rodriguez

N.D.Ohio: Criminal acts on premises is not a waiver of a REP in it

Defendant did not own the premises searched, but he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in it because of his connection to it. Also, criminal acts on the premises is not a waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy. Minnesota … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Criminal acts on premises is not a waiver of a REP in it

OR: A question to a fidgety driver about weapons in the car didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

Defendant was pulled over after passing a parked police car three times, and the officer seeing the tags were expired on the third pass. When defendant was pulled over, he was unusually fidgety. A question about weapons in the car … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: A question to a fidgety driver about weapons in the car didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

OH5: Staleness argument fails as to ongoing MJ grow operation

Information about a marijuana grow operation was ongoing by its nature, so staleness is more flexible as to it and information can be older. Also, the good faith exception would apply. State v. Laubacher, 2019-Ohio-4271, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4343 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Staleness argument fails as to ongoing MJ grow operation

IL: Merely radioing for a drug dog did not materially extend a stop that was only 3 minutes long

This case is on post-conviction, and defendant attached a police report to his petition. Based on the police report, the mere act of radioing for a drug dog did not appreciably extend the stop which took three minutes. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Merely radioing for a drug dog did not materially extend a stop that was only 3 minutes long

OH: On LPN check, car not matching color on registration is enough for a stop to see if it’s stolen

“When an officer encounters a vehicle the whole of which is painted a different color from the color listed in the vehicle-registration records and the officer believes, based on his experience, that the vehicle or its displayed license plates may … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH: On LPN check, car not matching color on registration is enough for a stop to see if it’s stolen

CA7: Airbnb tenant who was theft victim can consent to police entry to rental unit

Plaintiff’s Airbnb tenant suffered a theft, and he had the authority to consent to an entry by police to investigate it. Wonsey v. City of Chicago, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 30651 (7th Cir. Oct. 15, 2019).* The officer didn’t prolong … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Airbnb tenant who was theft victim can consent to police entry to rental unit

TN: Possession of meth in truck many months earlier wasn’t PC to believe it’s there now

Defendant’s alleged possession of methamphetamine in his truck many months earlier was not probable cause to believe it could still be there at the time of the search. Defendant’s possession of a meth pipe, however, gave cause to search the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on TN: Possession of meth in truck many months earlier wasn’t PC to believe it’s there now

CA6: Merely alleging pat-down search was done “without a legitimate reason” doesn’t state a 4A claim; more required

“Merely alleging that Jones’ conducting pat-down searches ‘without a legitimate reason’ is insufficient to state a plausible claim of a Fourth Amendment violation. Under the Fourth Amendment, ‘[t]he touchstone of whether a given search or seizure is reasonable is whether … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Merely alleging pat-down search was done “without a legitimate reason” doesn’t state a 4A claim; more required

MD: License plate reader’s alert of lack of insurance was RS for stop

The trooper’s license plate reader scan showed defendant’s vehicle had no insurance on file. That was reasonable suspicion for the stop. Gary v. State, 2019 Md. App. LEXIS 870 (Oct. 9, 2019). Also,

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: License plate reader’s alert of lack of insurance was RS for stop

S.D.Ga.: It was reasonable to stop defendant and inquire where def was parked next to a dilapidated building

Defendant’s stop for parking near a dilapidated maybe abandoned structure was reasonable because the officers were justified in inquiring who he was and what he was doing. In their experience, this activity supported at least an inference that defendant might … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: It was reasonable to stop defendant and inquire where def was parked next to a dilapidated building

N.D.Ind.: Arrest outside motel room still permitted protective sweep where there was RS someone else was there

Defendant was arrested outside his motel room, but that did not bar a protective sweep of the motel room where the officers had reason to believe others could be present. Baldwin v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175253 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Arrest outside motel room still permitted protective sweep where there was RS someone else was there

ID: State’s claim of exigency for warrantless entry into house was unsupported; suppression affirmed

Defendant was allegedly selling tainted marijuana from his house. Police did a warrantless entry with exigency as the excuse. There wasn’t any claim that anybody inside was in distress, and no questions about it. Suppression affirmed. State v. Sessions, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: State’s claim of exigency for warrantless entry into house was unsupported; suppression affirmed

D.Nev.: Govt’s stated intent to forfeit requires motion for return of property be denied

Motion for return of property seized five weeks ago is denied. The government will image electronics and return them. That which is subject to forfeiture has to await it. United States v. Wells, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168017 (D. Nev. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Govt’s stated intent to forfeit requires motion for return of property be denied

E.D.Mo.: 4A IAC claim denied for not specifying what it would prove and because waived by plea

“Petitioner’s Claim 9 is likewise conclusory and without merit. Petitioner claims that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate a potential Fourth Amendment violation regarding Petitioner’s consent to search his residence and computer. However, Petitioner has not explained how such … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: 4A IAC claim denied for not specifying what it would prove and because waived by plea

KS: Words spoken on one’s curtilage heard off the property are not protected by the 4A

Defendant was convicted of violating an order of protection for speaking disparagingly about the other person. She made the comment from her curtilage to her husband but loud enough to be heard across the street where the other person lived. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Words spoken on one’s curtilage heard off the property are not protected by the 4A

OH2: Road rage: Panicked driver’s pointing out car that pointed gun justified stop under Navarette and Long permitted protective search for weapon

“Based upon the informant’s face-to-face, contemporaneous, and panicked report of a startling event (the waving of a gun in the vehicle directly behind Underwood’s cruiser), we conclude that the informant’s tip was reliable. This reliability allowed Underwood ‘to credit the … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Road rage: Panicked driver’s pointing out car that pointed gun justified stop under Navarette and Long permitted protective search for weapon

LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

Defendant was detained unreasonably without reasonable suspicion and then her car was searched for a weapon but none was found. Then the detaining officer called for a female officer to conduct a search of her person. “Because reasonable suspicion was … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

NE: After stop concluded, “[H]ey, before you go, do you have a minute to talk to me?” led to consensual extension of stop

The officer, in effect, told defendant she was free to leave, but he kept talking. “Second, VanWinkle did not require compliance with her request. VanWinkle asked, ‘[H]ey, before you go, do you have a minute to talk to me?’ The … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: After stop concluded, “[H]ey, before you go, do you have a minute to talk to me?” led to consensual extension of stop

S.D.W.Va.: The single question “are there any weapons in the car” doesn’t extend the stop in violation of Rodriguez

“Even assuming here that the single question, whether there were any weapons in the car, was not related to the mission of the traffic stop, the question did not violate the Fourth Amendment because it did not lengthen the traffic … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: The single question “are there any weapons in the car” doesn’t extend the stop in violation of Rodriguez