Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

SCOTUS: Mistake of law can justify a stop on reasonable suspicion; Heien v. North Carolina

Heien v. North Carolina, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 8306 (Dec. 15, 2014): Mistake of law can justify a stop on reasonable suspicion. [So ironic for Bill of Rights Day.] The Syllabus:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Uncategorized | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Mistake of law can justify a stop on reasonable suspicion; Heien v. North Carolina

KY: Suppression and dismissal during bench trial is double jeopardy; error or not

In a bench trial, the defendant moved to suppress during the trial, and it was granted. Based on that, the state called no witnesses, and the trial court dismissed the case. Correct or not, the defendant can’t be retried because … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Suppression and dismissal during bench trial is double jeopardy; error or not

N.M.I.: When the prosecution claims an area is “high crime,” they have to prove it, and the officer’s mere assertions are not enough

When the prosecution claims an area is “high crime,” they have to prove it, and the officer’s mere assertions are not enough: “‘[j]ust as a man with a hammer sees every problem as a nail, so a man with a … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.M.I.: When the prosecution claims an area is “high crime,” they have to prove it, and the officer’s mere assertions are not enough

N.D.Cal.: When the gov’t claims “high crime” area justifying pursuit when one flees, it has to prove the area was

Flight in an area the officers claim is “high crime” doesn’t make the area “high crime”–the prosecution has to prove it. Some areas of California, and most of some cities cannot be labeled “high crime” at all. Wardlow requires flight … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: When the gov’t claims “high crime” area justifying pursuit when one flees, it has to prove the area was

OH4: Padlocked bedroom in house shared with probationer couldn’t be searched by PO

Police and a probation officer entered defendant’s premises because his housemate was on probation. A padlocked bedroom could not be searched because there was no reason to believe it was the probationer’s. One officer testified to hearing noises inside, another … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Padlocked bedroom in house shared with probationer couldn’t be searched by PO

WaPo: Justice to expand rules to curb racial profiling

WaPo: Justice Dept. announces new rules to curb racial profiling by federal law enforcement by Sari Horwitz: The Justice Department rules are only considered guidance for officers in state and local departments and will cover those officers when they participate … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WaPo: Justice to expand rules to curb racial profiling

CA4: Raising hands when asked if armed and saying “no” can be implied consent to patdown

Defendant impliedly consented to a patdown. When he was asked if he was armed, he raised his arms and said no. The officer understood that to be an invitation. United States v. Cohen, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22934 (4th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Raising hands when asked if armed and saying “no” can be implied consent to patdown

FL2: Driving slower than others, but not too slow, isn’t cause for a stop

Driving slower than others, but not too slow, isn’t cause for a stop. The use of community caretaking function as an excuse here doesn’t work because there are no objective facts to support it. Agreda v. State, 2014 Fla. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL2: Driving slower than others, but not too slow, isn’t cause for a stop

DE: A frisk has to be based on reasonable suspicion; protocol not enough

A frisk during a traffic stop, without reasonable suspicion and based solely on protocol, violated Terry. “All parties agree that it was permissible for the officers to stop and search the vehicle. There was a broken headlight, and the officers’ … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on DE: A frisk has to be based on reasonable suspicion; protocol not enough

PA: “Gun-like bulge,” high crime area, and turning away from the officer was RS

A “gun-like bulge” in clothing, high crime area, and turning away from the officer as he went by was reasonable suspicion defendant was armed. Commonwealth v. Carter, 2014 PA Super 265, 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4539 (December 2, 2014).* The … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: “Gun-like bulge,” high crime area, and turning away from the officer was RS

SCOTUSblog: Cases and controversies: Racial disparities in law enforcement practices

SCOTUSblog: Cases and controversies: Racial disparities in law enforcement practices by Eric Criton: In the 1996 case of Whren v. United States, the Court considered essentially the following question: If the police pull you over because you are black, but … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SCOTUSblog: Cases and controversies: Racial disparities in law enforcement practices

ID applies McNeely and requires a warrant for DWI blood draws

McNeely requires a warrant for DWI BAC blood draws. State v. Halseth, 2014 Ida. LEXIS 313 (December 2, 2014). The EEOC sent emails about age discrimination to hundreds of plaintiff’s employees. The company sued the EEOC claiming, inter alia, a … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on ID applies McNeely and requires a warrant for DWI blood draws

AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

The exclusionary rule does not apply in drivers license suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience. Here, it’s not. Garibay v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles, 2014 Alas. LEXIS 222 (November 28, 2014). … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Exclusionary rule, Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’ implied consent statute is not unconstitutional per se under McNeely. Every case has to be judged on its own facts. This involved a serious accident with injuries requiring hospitalization and defendant consented to the blood draw. People v. Hasselbring, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

CA8: If male owner of vehicle has suspended DL, officer isn’t required to ID driver’s gender before stop

The officer here ran an LPN check and determined that the owner of the vehicle, a man, had a suspended DL. A woman was driving, but the officer could see that from the rear. “Given the road and weather conditions, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: If male owner of vehicle has suspended DL, officer isn’t required to ID driver’s gender before stop

WSJ: How It Felt to Be a ‘Suspicious’ Black Teen

WSJ: How It Felt to Be a ‘Suspicious’ Black Teen by Gary Fields: Essay: Ferguson reminds a Journal reporter of times in his youth when he was singled out by police.

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WSJ: How It Felt to Be a ‘Suspicious’ Black Teen

CA7: Defense witness on apparent authority completely unbelievable

This district court did not credit defendant’s witness on the question of consent. As for credibility, “The court relied on the officers’ corroborative testimony, Hearnes’s ‘willingness to lie to law enforcement and under oath,’ and Hearnes’s demeanor throughout her testimony, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Defense witness on apparent authority completely unbelievable

OH3: Where there’s cause for a traffic stop, the ulterior motive to question the passenger about drugs really doesn’t matter

If there is cause for a traffic stop, the ulterior motive to question the passenger about drugs really doesn’t matter. State v. Gartrell, 2014-Ohio-5203, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 5044 (3d Dist. November 24, 2014):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH3: Where there’s cause for a traffic stop, the ulterior motive to question the passenger about drugs really doesn’t matter

IN: When stop of car is because owner has suspended DL but owner is passenger, stop must end

The officer stopped the car because the owner had a suspended DL. The owner was in the back seat and said who she was and that she was suspended. At that point, there was no justification for asking the driver … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: When stop of car is because owner has suspended DL but owner is passenger, stop must end

TN: No relief under plain error for McLaughlin error of no PC determination in 48 hours because of muddled facts

In a case that started in 1997 and was the subject of a successful habeas petition, defendant is not entitled to relief for a McLaughlin error where he was held more than 48 hours without a probable cause determination and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: No relief under plain error for McLaughlin error of no PC determination in 48 hours because of muddled facts