Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

W.D.Pa.: Even a closed email account adds nothing to a child porn staleness argument

Officers in the U.S. received information from Queensland, Australia that an Australian using a hotmail account had been emailing child pornography. One of those was in this district. By the time the search warrant was sought nine months later, the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Even a closed email account adds nothing to a child porn staleness argument

DE Super.Ct. holds after a traffic stop consent can’t be sought without RS; otherwise it’s just official harassment

When the traffic stop was over, the officer gratuitously asked for consent to search without any inkling of reasonable suspicion, and the driver consented. The court finds that unreasonable and suppresses. State v. Geist, 2016 Del. Super. LEXIS 594 (Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE Super.Ct. holds after a traffic stop consent can’t be sought without RS; otherwise it’s just official harassment

D.Kan.: Protective sweep is different from search incident; search of trunk was excessive as a protective sweep

A protective sweep is different from a search incident and they are founded on different precepts. The search of the car interior was valid as a protective sweep, but the trunk was not. United States v. Cooks, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Protective sweep is different from search incident; search of trunk was excessive as a protective sweep

MS: Delay for dog sniff doesn’t seem to matter in Mississippi if the dog is already there

The court holds essentially that it didn’t matter whether there was reasonable suspicion or not for a dog sniff after a traffic stop. Also, there’s no ineffective assistance claim to a forfeiture. In re One Hundred Thirtyseven Thousand Three Hundred … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Delay for dog sniff doesn’t seem to matter in Mississippi if the dog is already there

S.D.Fla.: Collective knowledge requires that the stopping officers have some knowledge of the reason for the stop

Collective knowledge doesn’t apply where the officers making the stop were not informed of what the DEA didn’t communicate. The stop was, however, valid based on traffic violations. The drug dog showed up while the main part of the traffic … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Collective knowledge requires that the stopping officers have some knowledge of the reason for the stop

NY: Shoplifting custodial arrest justified impoundment and towing of def’s car

Defendant drove to a store and was custodially arrested there for shoplifting. Towing and inventory of his vehicle off their parking lot was reasonable. A valid inventory followed. People v. Tardi, 2016 NY Slip Op 07822, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 3535 … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Shoplifting custodial arrest justified impoundment and towing of def’s car

E.D.N.Y.: Finding NYPD officers were “embroidering the truth” about their RS, court finds it elsewhere

The court finds reasonable suspicion for a stop and frisk but not on the grounds offered – the officers were “embroidering the truth” about an alleged parking violation and the smell of marijuana. United States v. Levy, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Finding NYPD officers were “embroidering the truth” about their RS, court finds it elsewhere

FL2: 12 year old accosted for no reason didn’t voluntarily consent

Police searched two 12 year old boys playing in the grassy common area of their mobile home park. Their alleged consent was involuntary because of their young age and no reason to accost them in the first place. Marijuana was … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL2: 12 year old accosted for no reason didn’t voluntarily consent

WV: Protective weapons search of def’s pants on ground while EMTs treating him was reasonable

Defendant had been patted down and nothing was found, but he was wounded and EMTs were there. His pants were removed, and he was being treated. Before the ambulance took him away, he asked for his pants and the officer … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WV: Protective weapons search of def’s pants on ground while EMTs treating him was reasonable

E.D.Tenn.: Def’s move with arm made officer grab his arm and then saw a holster; that’s RS

When defendant made a move with his arm, the officer could grab his arm for officer safety. That resulted in the officer seeing a holster and that justified a full search of the person. Ultimately, it was justified as incident … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def’s move with arm made officer grab his arm and then saw a holster; that’s RS

E.D.Mo.: Welfare check of def in car led to opening door and smelling MJ, and that’s PC

“But even if the police lacked probable cause to search the van immediately upon discovering it, the undersigned concludes that Officer Yadlosky was justified in opening the van door to check on the welfare of the occupant inside. Once the … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Welfare check of def in car led to opening door and smelling MJ, and that’s PC

D.Me.: Officer doesn’t have to articulate the RS for continuing the stop

The officer doesn’t have a constitutional obligation to tell (“articulate”) the suspect the reasonable suspicion that forms the basis of the stop. “Cf. Devenpeck v. Alford, 543 U.S. 146, 155 (2004) (‘While it is assuredly good police practice to inform … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Officer doesn’t have to articulate the RS for continuing the stop

OH11: Trial court’s finding of no RS to delay the stop was clearly erroneous

The trial court’s finding that the officer delayed the stop without reasonable suspicion is clearly erroneous because the record does not support the finding. State v. Taylor, 2016-Ohio-7745, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4613 (11th Dist. Nov. 14, 2016):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH11: Trial court’s finding of no RS to delay the stop was clearly erroneous

CA5: “criminal activity underfoot” was reasonable suspicion

Court seemingly confuses “criminal activity a foot” with “criminal activity underfoot.” Leaving a gun in a stranger’s car here was reasonable suspicion for further action. United States v. Cook, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20339 (5th Cir. Nov. 11, 2016):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: “criminal activity underfoot” was reasonable suspicion

CA6: Rule 41(g) motion for return of property doesn’t lie in federal court when state officers seized, even in a federal prosecution

Rule 41(g) motion for return of property requires that officers of the federal government have seized it. Where state and local authorities seized the property, a 41(g) motion doesn’t lie in federal court. United States v. Price, 2016 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6: Rule 41(g) motion for return of property doesn’t lie in federal court when state officers seized, even in a federal prosecution

NY co.ct.: Noting split in case law, slight smell of MJ in the passenger compartment generally doesn’t justify a search of the trunk; here, however, trunk accessible from inside car

Noting a split in authorities, the court finds that the smell of marijuana in the passenger compartment [here, coming off the rental agreement] does not give probable cause to search the trunk. Here, however, the trunk was accessible from the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY co.ct.: Noting split in case law, slight smell of MJ in the passenger compartment generally doesn’t justify a search of the trunk; here, however, trunk accessible from inside car

IA: Trained drug dog’s instinctive jump into the window of def’s car didn’t make the dog sniff unreasonable

A trained drug dog’s instinctive jump through an open window and into defendant’s vehicle did not violate his right to be free from unreasonable searches. [If the dog is so well-trained, what’s it doing jumping through the window anyway? The … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Trained drug dog’s instinctive jump into the window of def’s car didn’t make the dog sniff unreasonable

NY4: Consent form filled out by police wasn’t proof of control of the premises; facts otherwise too vague

Defendant’s consent form was written by the police with boilerplate language, and the consent form is not sufficient evidence of control of the place searched. For all the proof shows, he was just somewhat familiar with the place and there … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Consent form filled out by police wasn’t proof of control of the premises; facts otherwise too vague

Two on justified reasonableness of delay of a traffic stop

The delay in defendant’s detention was reasonable because a person with the same name had been previously deported, and officers were trying to get a picture of that person sent to them. United States v. Jimenez-Delatorre, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Two on justified reasonableness of delay of a traffic stop

IA: All specifics of lack of PC need to be raised in trial court; here, this argument was waived

Defendant was stopped for having one headlight. The specific claim that there was no probable cause for pulling him over because he wasn’t on a public road was never presented to the trial court, and it’s waived. State v. Tusler, … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: All specifics of lack of PC need to be raised in trial court; here, this argument was waived