Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

MA: Pinging a cell phone is a search, but here it was with exigent circumstances

Pinging a cell phone to find its location was a search under the Massachusetts Constitution and Fourth Amendment, but it was reasonable because the state showed true exigent circumstances. Commonwealth v. Almonor, 482 Mass. 35 (Apr. 23, 2019). Washington declines … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on MA: Pinging a cell phone is a search, but here it was with exigent circumstances

ScotusBlog: Argument analysis: Justices debate warrantless blood draw for unconscious drunk driver

ScotusBlog: Argument analysis: Justices debate warrantless blood draw for unconscious drunk driver by Amy Howe:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on ScotusBlog: Argument analysis: Justices debate warrantless blood draw for unconscious drunk driver

MO: Warrantless blood draw from unresponsive person requires SW [issue also pending in SCOTUS]

The warrantless blood draw here was without exigent circumstances. The state instead relies on state statute, which the court finds a warrantless blood draw from an unresponsive person violates the Fourth Amendment. State v. Osborn, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 542 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on MO: Warrantless blood draw from unresponsive person requires SW [issue also pending in SCOTUS]

KY: Possession of MJ on one’s person away from home doesn’t create exigency for search of house

Defendant’s possession of marijuana on his person away from his house didn’t create exigent circumstances for a search of it. Giles v. Commonwealth, 2019 Ky. App. LEXIS 6= (Apr. 12, 2019). Installation of an electronically read gas meter was a … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on KY: Possession of MJ on one’s person away from home doesn’t create exigency for search of house

PA: Officer safety was not presumed to be exigency where def did nothing to warrant fear he’d use a weapon by merely refusing consent and walking away

Exigency of officer safety did not permit officers to search defendant’s garage. They came without a search warrant to arrest a third person. Defendant denied anyone else was there, refused to consent to a search, and turned and walked away. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Nexus | Comments Off on PA: Officer safety was not presumed to be exigency where def did nothing to warrant fear he’d use a weapon by merely refusing consent and walking away

TX10: Exigency and protective sweep justified entry after a shooting

“The evidence presented at the suppression hearing, when viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling, supports the denial of Weems’s motion to suppress based on either the exigent-circumstances or protective-sweep doctrines. … Specifically, once Taylor opened … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TX10: Exigency and protective sweep justified entry after a shooting

S.D.Cal.: Fire call about structure fire was erroneous, and further entry into backyard was unreasonable

The San Diego County Fire Department got a call about a structure fire. When they arrived, it turned out to be a small fire in a brush pile in defendant’s backyard that was virtually out. The exigency dissipated and it … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Fire call about structure fire was erroneous, and further entry into backyard was unreasonable

CA11: Warrantless search of crawlspace after hostage standoff was reasonable

After a hostage standoff, police officers’ warrantless search of defendant’s crawlspace for other potential hostages was reasonable based on what they knew and didn’t know. United States v. Cooks, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9775 (11th Cir. Apr. 2, 2019):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA11: Warrantless search of crawlspace after hostage standoff was reasonable

D.Ore..: Running drug dog around car after a DUI arrest was reasonable

Defendant was arrested for DUII and there was probable cause. “As Mr. Aruiza-Andrade was under arrest, the further delay while a canine was summoned did not unlawfully extend the traffic stop.” United States v. Aruiza-Andrade, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53788 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Ore..: Running drug dog around car after a DUI arrest was reasonable

MA: There were objectively PC and exigency for a warrantless search of def’s hands for DNA from a homicide

There was objective probable cause for a warrantless search of defendant’s hands for potential DNA in a murder case because it was easily destructible. There was also sufficient probable cause for a search warrant for his apartment for further evidence … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MA: There were objectively PC and exigency for a warrantless search of def’s hands for DNA from a homicide

MA: No objective basis for officers to believe exigency occurred at premises of 911 call to support a warrantless entry

Officers had no objective basis to believe that there was an exigency for entry into defendant’s premises. There was a 911 call but nothing at the scene, including talking to people there, supported any inference that anything was wrong there. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on MA: No objective basis for officers to believe exigency occurred at premises of 911 call to support a warrantless entry

D.Mass.: Realtime CSLI on exigency was reasonable under Carpenter

Warrantless realtime CSLI for exigency did not violate Carpenter. Indeed, exigencies are contemplated by Carpenter. [Aside from the fact Carpenter came after all this happened.] Defendant also consented to other seizures. United States v. Saemisch, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32706 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Realtime CSLI on exigency was reasonable under Carpenter

D.N.M.: Meth possession is a ‘serious crime’ for purposes of a warrantless entry into a home for the destruction-of-evidence exception

The court “will not suppress the evidence obtained pursuant to the BCSO deputies’ search. The Court agrees with the United States’ contentions that the BCSO deputies acted reasonably when they entered Cruz’ home without a warrant, because they satisfy the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Meth possession is a ‘serious crime’ for purposes of a warrantless entry into a home for the destruction-of-evidence exception

CA1: Potential for immediate destruction of evidence in this case permitted entry onto the curtilage to check def’s truck

Defendant was accused of traveling from New Hampshire to Maine to shoot his wife after breaking in the house she was staying in. Officers in Maine reported to New Hampshire police the shooting, and they went to defendant’s house. They … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA1: Potential for immediate destruction of evidence in this case permitted entry onto the curtilage to check def’s truck

D.Minn.: Exigent cell phone ping not barred by Carpenter

An exigent circumstances cell phone ping was not prohibited by Carpenter. United States v. Andrews, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26283 (D. Minn. Feb. 20, 2019):

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Exigent cell phone ping not barred by Carpenter

CA7: SW affidavit failed to show nexus, but it was close enough for GFE

The affidavit for a search warrant for a third person’s home where defendant spent a lot of time was deficient on showing nexus and defendant’s connection to it, but it otherwise showed probable cause. Actually, right after three controlled buys, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA7: SW affidavit failed to show nexus, but it was close enough for GFE

IN: Long term missing person report and house in disarray justified emergency entry

A missing person report which included no birthday call for the only time in the person’s life with a house in disarray here justified a warrantless entry into the house to see what was going on. The entry was valid … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Long term missing person report and house in disarray justified emergency entry

NM retains subjective element of the emergency aid doctrine for a warrantless entry from its prior case law

New Mexico retains subjective element of the emergency aid doctrine for a warrantless entry from its prior case law. It rejects that part of Brigham City v. Stuart under state constitution. State v. Yazzie, 2019 N.M. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 24, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, State constitution | Comments Off on NM retains subjective element of the emergency aid doctrine for a warrantless entry from its prior case law

CA4: Once def knew he was target of a child porn investigation, exigency for seizure of cell phones was apparent

In interviewing the defendant about possible possession of child pornography, his answers created exigent circumstances for seizure of his cell phone because he was well aware of what he was accused of and could then destroy evidence. The two day … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA4: Once def knew he was target of a child porn investigation, exigency for seizure of cell phones was apparent

IL: Fatal accident alone not PC for blood draw; no exigency argued either

Just because defendant was involved in a fatal accident where his passenger died, there wasn’t probable cause for a blood draw. The state did not argue exigent circumstances below or on appeal, but that would also require probable cause. People … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IL: Fatal accident alone not PC for blood draw; no exigency argued either