Category Archives: Probable cause

N.D.W.Va.: BOP nurse is not a law enforcement agent

A nurse in a federal prison was not acting in a law enforcement capacity in evaluating injuries to an inmate. United States v. Andrews, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56159 (N.D. W.Va. April 23, 2014). Two controlled buys were probable cause. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: BOP nurse is not a law enforcement agent

AntiWar.com: What Fourth Amendment? Police Raids Go Beyond the War on Drugs [like an offensive Twitter post?]

AntiWar.com: What Fourth Amendment? Police Raids Go Beyond the War on Drugs by Lucy Steigerwald:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on AntiWar.com: What Fourth Amendment? Police Raids Go Beyond the War on Drugs [like an offensive Twitter post?]

TN: Opening car door of person asleep in car in parking lot was unreasonable

Because Tennessee hasn’t yet recognized a community caretaking search, an officer opening a car door of somebody apparently asleep behind the wheel at night in a parking lot was unreasonable. There was no report of a “person in peril” or … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Opening car door of person asleep in car in parking lot was unreasonable

N.D.Ill.: Consent by person with apparent authority “trumped” defendant’s remote refusal

A woman answered the door at 10 am in a bathrobe, suggesting she lived there or at least spent the night. Further inquiry showed apparent authority. Her consent “trumped” defendant’s remote refusal. United States v. Terry, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Consent by person with apparent authority “trumped” defendant’s remote refusal

KS: Trash pull lacked nexus to house; buying fertilizer not PC for a grow operation

Officers did a trash pull because a person living at the target address bought “perlite soil conditioner and liquid fertilizer from the Green Circle Garden Center.” (They were running LPNs of people buying that stuff.) In the trash bags was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on KS: Trash pull lacked nexus to house; buying fertilizer not PC for a grow operation

M.D.La.: Smell of marijuana on traffic stop justified its continuation

“Corporal Spelying’s continued detention of the defendant to ask him questions regarding his suspended license and his travel itinerary did not violate the Fourth Amendment” because he could smell marijuana immediately into the stop. United States v. Robertson, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Smell of marijuana on traffic stop justified its continuation

Cal.1: Possession of a felt tip marker not a crime without intent to graffitiize

Possession of a felt tip marker is not per se illegal as possession of graffiti tools. Intent to graffitiize still has to be required. The juvenile’s arrest was without probable cause. In re S.F., 224 Cal. App. 4th 1575 (1st … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.1: Possession of a felt tip marker not a crime without intent to graffitiize

WA: Being an MMJ patient doesn’t negate PC for SW for grow operation

Whether the target of a search is a medical marijuana patient is an affirmative defense at trial. Therefore, it doesn’t factor into the probable cause determination. State v. Reis, 2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 759 (March 31, 2014). Defendant was arrested … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on WA: Being an MMJ patient doesn’t negate PC for SW for grow operation

New Law Review Article: Civil discovery as a search? Probable cause required?

New Law Review Article: A Tale of Two Searches: Intrusive Civil Discovery Rules Violate the Fourth Amendment Chad DeVeaux, A Tale of Two Searches: Intrusive Civil Discovery Rules Violate the Fourth Amendment, 46 Conn. L. Rev. 1083 (2014). Abstract:

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Leave a comment