Category Archives: Good faith exception

D.Minn.: Complete failure of showing nexus fails PC and GFE

The affidavit for the search warrant completely failed to show nexus to defendant’s house and drugs. Complete lack of nexus does not support the good faith exception either. United States v. Rios-Uscanga, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68991 (D.Minn. March 13, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Complete failure of showing nexus fails PC and GFE

E.D.N.Y.: 791 days of GPS tracking of a parolee suppressed

Back on December 29th was this post: E.D.N.Y.: 791 days of GPS tracking of a parolee to catch others in a DTO was [somehow] not unreasonable. On review, Judge Weinstein finds that intense tracking violated the Fourth Amendment and there … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: 791 days of GPS tracking of a parolee suppressed

MD: Issue on appeal more nuanced and different that one presented to the trial court

Defendant’s issue on appeal is more nuanced, yet not the same as the one argued before the trial court, so there is no authority to decide it. So, the court does for the sake of argument, and it finds nexus. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on MD: Issue on appeal more nuanced and different that one presented to the trial court

TN: No consent to blood draw where def pulled out of car at gun point and told his blood was being taken

Defendant did not freely and voluntarily give his actual consent because he was pulled over by police officers, ordered out of his car at gun point, read the implied consent form, and informed that officers would hold him down and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Voluntariness | Comments Off on TN: No consent to blood draw where def pulled out of car at gun point and told his blood was being taken

Texas finally adopts the Davis good faith exception to its statutory exclusionary rule

Texas finally adopts the Davis good faith exception to its statutory exclusionary rule to a pre-Jardines dog sniff in a wide ranging and scholarly opinion surveying all the federal circuits on Davis and attenuation. McClintock v. State, 2017 Tex. Crim. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Texas finally adopts the Davis good faith exception to its statutory exclusionary rule

E.D.Tex.: Cell phone + drug case = PC to search cell phone

Drug dealers commonly use cell phones to ply their trade, and that was stated in the affidavit for the search warrant. The USMJ signed the warrant for cell phones, too. Accordingly, the search warrant was executed in good faith. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Cell phone + drug case = PC to search cell phone

CA4: Pre-Rodriguez stop was valid under law at time

Rodriguez was decided after the stop, and the circuit recognized de minimus delays in the stop. Moreover, the stop is not calculated merely by time: “Under Digiovanni and other pre-Rodriguez cases, that Deputy McMurray may have been able to end … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Pre-Rodriguez stop was valid under law at time

CA10: GFE saves general warrant where affidavit specific and affiant served the warrant

Where officers obtained a warrant and searched two cell phones seized at the time of defendant’s arrest, the search warrant was invalid because it did not satisfy the particularity requirement since it did not identify either of the phones that … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: GFE saves general warrant where affidavit specific and affiant served the warrant

AZ: Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny; this one lacked all particularity and no GFE applies

Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny. The search warrant for defendant’s computer lacked any particularity, and it could not be saved by the good faith exception. State v. Dean, 2017 Ariz. App. LEXIS 12 (Jan. 12, 2017):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on AZ: Computer search warrants get greater scrutiny; this one lacked all particularity and no GFE applies

E.D.Mo.: SW description was defective but reference to affidavit and GFE saves it

The warrant was defective on its face, only authorizing a search of the person of the accused. The affidavit for the warrant, however, was more detailed and described places and things: a hotel room and a Mercedes. The officer sought … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: SW description was defective but reference to affidavit and GFE saves it

D.V.I.: Telephonic warrant requirements were complied with and GFE didn’t apply

The telephonic search warrant here failed the requirements of Rule 41, including the verbatim reading of the warrant to the issuing judge, and didn’t mention that they also wanted to search a car that was omitted from the warrant. The … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Telephonic warrant requirements were complied with and GFE didn’t apply

IL: GFE does not apply to seizure under a statute later held unconstitutional

Defendant was stopped and relieved of a handgun by the police and charged with it. Four years later, the state supreme court held that possession of a handgun alone, without criminal purpose, violated the Second Amendment. Defendant gets the benefit … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: GFE does not apply to seizure under a statute later held unconstitutional

E.D.Mich.: Attempt to show nexus was “bare bones,” and GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant was suspected of a robbery, and he had some thin connection to a house he’d been kicked out of because of a domestic dispute. He’d been seen taking the trash out and his car was there once. The court … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Attempt to show nexus was “bare bones,” and GFE doesn’t apply

TN adopts good faith exception for unsigned affidavit but sworn officer in 2007 DP case

The officer in this case hurriedly prepared an affidavit and warrant to search defendant’s property. When printing it, he didn’t notice that the document was typed for legal size paper but the printer had only letter size in it. He … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on TN adopts good faith exception for unsigned affidavit but sworn officer in 2007 DP case

DE: Search incident of book bag left in car for FTA arrest violates Gant

Defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped for a brake light violation. The officer found an outstanding warrant for failure to appear and defendant was arrested and put into the patrol car. The search of defendant’s book bag back … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on DE: Search incident of book bag left in car for FTA arrest violates Gant

Cal.: The good faith exception doesn’t save a cell phone search that wasn’t even valid before Riley in California

The good faith exception doesn’t save a cell phone search that wasn’t even valid before Riley in California. “In People v. Diaz (2011) 51 Cal.4th 84 (Diaz), we held that, incident to a custodial arrest, police may search through data … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Cal.: The good faith exception doesn’t save a cell phone search that wasn’t even valid before Riley in California

E.D.N.C.: CSLI warrant didn’t show PC on informant information or timeliness; GFE did not apply

The prospective CSLI warrant failed to show probable cause on the facts of informant hearsay or overcome staleness, and the motion to suppress is granted. (Also, the owner of a cell phone has standing to challenge GPS tracking of his … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: CSLI warrant didn’t show PC on informant information or timeliness; GFE did not apply

SD: Exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry into def’s apartment in case there was an injured victim inside

Exigent circumstances supported the warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment. A witness told the police he’d been asked to move a body and he did move a heavy suitcase, big enough to hold the body of a woman. He didn’t know … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on SD: Exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry into def’s apartment in case there was an injured victim inside

E.D.N.C.: No PC for GPS information from any phone that connected to the target phone; and no GFE

“Because the first pen order allowed officers to retrieve GPS location information about any phone which contacted the target phones, and nothing in the affidavit shows the relation between those contacting phones and the underlying criminal activity, the magistrate judge … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: No PC for GPS information from any phone that connected to the target phone; and no GFE

E.D.Wis.: Facebook SW had thin but sufficient showing of PC, and GFE applied

The police had information that armed robbers were communicating on Facebook about their plans. The affidavit of probable cause as to this defendant’s Facebook account was thin, but it was similar to that of the other defendants and it still … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Good faith exception, Independent source | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Facebook SW had thin but sufficient showing of PC, and GFE applied