Category Archives: Good faith exception

S.D.Ga.: Oral military search authorizations do not violate 4A or Rule 41

Oral search warrant requests and authorizations under M.R.E. 315 do not violate the Fourth Amendment or Rule 41. Many cases so hold. The violation of the SOP manual for military magistrates wasn’t serious enough to justify suppression nor prevent the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Oral military search authorizations do not violate 4A or Rule 41

E.D.Mich.: Second SW issued three weeks after first had no additional information to overcome staleness; no GFE

Defendant was the target of a search warrant. Three weeks later, police obtained another search warrant using the prior information attempted to be supplemented by defendant’s Facebook page. There was also a failed controlled buy there. There was insufficient new … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Second SW issued three weeks after first had no additional information to overcome staleness; no GFE

E.D.Va.: No evidence defendant “is a collector of child pornography,” so no PC; remanded for factual determination of GFE

The government did not show probable cause to believe that child pornography was on defendant’s electronic devices. The officer’s experience is one thing, but no facts suggest that defendant “is a collector of child pornography.” The record is inadequate to … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: No evidence defendant “is a collector of child pornography,” so no PC; remanded for factual determination of GFE

E.D.N.Y.: Facebook SW was far too broad, but court declines to decide 4A question and goes with GFE instead

This Facebook warrant just seeks way, way too much information when it could have been far more narrowly tailored. “That said, the court need not decide whether the Facebook Warrant violated the Fourth Amendment because, even if it did, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Facebook SW was far too broad, but court declines to decide 4A question and goes with GFE instead

W.D.N.Y.: Govt gets benefit of GFE which overrides Franks [without sufficiently telling us why]

Defendant twice asked the USMJ for a Franks hearing and never got one. On review, application of the good faith exception is sustained. “Here, the Government has shown that McMahon and the other law enforcement officers that executed the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Govt gets benefit of GFE which overrides Franks [without sufficiently telling us why]

W.D.N.C.: The fact def’s car crossed the county line between when the police car lights came on and when he was stopped is not a basis to suppress

The fact a stop was started in one county and actually occurred as defendant crossed the county line is not a basis for suppressing the stop. Defendant’s consent to search his house is suppressed, however, because of language difficulties: “Thus, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: The fact def’s car crossed the county line between when the police car lights came on and when he was stopped is not a basis to suppress

D.R.I.: CSLI warrant lacked PC and GFE not applied

In what may be a first, the District of Rhode Island suppresses both CSLI and an apartment search warrant for lack of probable cause and then declines to apply the good faith exception. United States v. Ramos, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.R.I.: CSLI warrant lacked PC and GFE not applied

Leon and the good faith exception is 35 today

Today is the 35th anniversary of United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), fittingly decided in 1984. As I related many years ago here, I did a CLE for Memphis prosecutors about a year later on how to litigate … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on Leon and the good faith exception is 35 today

IL: Carpenter applies to CSLI search five years before it was decided because there was no binding precedent to contrary

Carpenter is applied to CSLI information obtained five years before it was decided. There was no binding precedent in Illinois or the Seventh Circuit, and the question was even avoided. People v. Strickland, 2019 IL App (1st) 16-1098, 2019 Ill. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: Carpenter applies to CSLI search five years before it was decided because there was no binding precedent to contrary

CA5: GFE saves search of cell phone seized when not specified in SW

A juvenile probation officer started an investigation into whether girls under his supervision were being pimped out. Substantial evidence was developed that concluded they were. A search warrant was obtained for defendant’s property, and computers were mentioned for seizure but … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: GFE saves search of cell phone seized when not specified in SW

C.D.Ill.: Def’s name and address aren’t constitutionally required to be in the SW

Defendant’s 2255 claim that his name and address weren’t in the search warrant doesn’t state any ground for relief because neither is constitutionally required. Lopez v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105807 (C.D. Ill. June 25, 2019). The affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Def’s name and address aren’t constitutionally required to be in the SW

E.D.Mich.: The affidavit for SW didn’t show nexus, but it wasn’t so lacking that GFE still didn’t apply

The court concludes that the government lacked nexus to defendant’s home for the search warrant because the proof was just lacking. It came down to two cases with similar but still sufficiently different facts reaching seemingly contradictory results on nexus. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: The affidavit for SW didn’t show nexus, but it wasn’t so lacking that GFE still didn’t apply

OH4: In applying GFE, court isn’t bound by the “four corners” rule because Leon requires “all the circumstances” be considered

The affidavit for search warrant was lacking probable cause, but it wasn’t “so lacking” that the good faith exception did not apply. Also, the “four corners” rule doesn’t bar a trial court from considering “all the circumstances” in deciding whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH4: In applying GFE, court isn’t bound by the “four corners” rule because Leon requires “all the circumstances” be considered

CA6 applies GFE to Carpenter on remand, and he still loses

The SCA was the law prior to Carpenter, so the good faith exception applies. From the date of Carpenter, the Fourth Amendment applies: “Carpenter II confirmed that the SCA does not immunize a government officer’s collection of CSLI from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, SCOTUS | Comments Off on CA6 applies GFE to Carpenter on remand, and he still loses

AZ: Choice of law, exclusionary rule, and GFE

“¶1 Don Jacob Havatone appeals from his convictions and sentences for two counts of aggravated driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (‘DUI’), one count of aggravated assault, one count of endangerment, and four counts of misdemeanor assault. Because a … Continue reading →

Posted in Choice of law, Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on AZ: Choice of law, exclusionary rule, and GFE

CA7: Def’s texting photos of a firearm to others that police saw was an independent source for the search

Defendant had texted a copy of a photograph of his AK-47 on his cell phone to another, and the police saw it. That gave cause and an independent source to search the phone for it. “We agree with the district … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Independent source | Comments Off on CA7: Def’s texting photos of a firearm to others that police saw was an independent source for the search

CA6 (en banc): The question of PC isn’t even close, and the GFE applies

The question of probable cause isn’t even close, and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Christian, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 16322 (6th Cir. May 31, 2019) (en banc). (The dissent is concerned about use of criminal history as … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6 (en banc): The question of PC isn’t even close, and the GFE applies

N.D.Okla.: While an attachment was missing from the official SW it was at the scene of the search, so no prejudice

The government conceded that Attachment C to the mail search warrant was missing from it, and thus that it led to a potentially overbroad search. The search team, however, all had copies of Attachment C, and it was at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: While an attachment was missing from the official SW it was at the scene of the search, so no prejudice

E.D.Ky.: Officer consulting prosecutor about SW before issuance is a factor in GFE

The officer’s consulting a prosecutor on the search warrant isn’t conclusive on good faith, but it is an important factor. United States v. Anderson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90265 (E.D. Ky. May 29, 2019). There was probable cause for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Officer consulting prosecutor about SW before issuance is a factor in GFE

DC: To get the benefit of Heien mistake of law, there has to be something that shows the law mistakenly applied actually applied, and here it didn’t

A D.C. police car stopped, backed up, and four officers got out of the car, walked over to defendant, and told him to “get up.” A reasonable person would not have believed he was free to leave, and this stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DC: To get the benefit of Heien mistake of law, there has to be something that shows the law mistakenly applied actually applied, and here it didn’t