N.D.W.Va.: Bare allegations of a Franks violation without a significant offer of proof is conjecture

Bare allegations of a Franks violation without a significant offer of proof is conjecture. Kokinda v. Foster, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60028 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2026).*

Exigent circumstances justified the seizure of defendant’s cell phone, not just plain view, and probable cause was shown for the warrant. This search was by consent, and it was on a consent form he signed and it’s on bodycam. United States v. Yener, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60641 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 20, 2026).*

The alleged lack of probable cause for petitioner’s arrest has nothing to do with the subsequent search warrant. United States v. Moss, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8471 (10th Cir. Mar. 23, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.