N.Y.Co.: Installing software on a cell phone to protect its data before search wasn’t unreasonable

“The Court is further unpersuaded by the Defendant’s assertion that the installation of software, aimed at preserving evidence rather than conducting a search, on the Defendant’s cellphone was an improper or unconstitutional intrusion. The manner in which law enforcement handled the Defendant’s cellphone after his arrest constituted reasonable steps to preserve data and prevent the locking or encryption of same.” People v. Martinez, 2026 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 340 (N.Y. Co. Jan. 30, 2026).

Reason to believe there’s a gun on the car with a felon is probable cause. State v. Rogers, 2026 Mo. LEXIS 31 (Feb. 3, 2026).*

The traffic stop was objectively reasonable, albeit pretextual for drugs. United States v. Harbach, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21903 (N.D. Iowa Feb. 3, 2026).*

There was a substantial basis for finding probable cause for the warrant here, and staleness didn’t apply because it was shown to be an ongoing drug operation. United States v. Brown, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22135 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.