E.D.Pa.: Def succeeds in suppressing a stop when he even lacked standing to challenge the search

Defendant was a passenger in the car that was stopped. While he wouldn’t have standing in the car, he persuaded the court that the stop lacked justification based on credibility of witnesses, and the motion to suppress is granted. United States v. Wynn, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184598 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2025).

On post-conviction, petitioner’s illegal arrest claim is defaulted because it should have been raised in the original case. But, it wasn’t even illegal. United States v. Orlandella, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184747 (D. Mass. Sep. 19, 2025).*

The officer making an arrest for assault doesn’t have to consider affirmative defenses unless they’re apparent. Here, the officer was on notice, but there was probable cause anyway. United States v. McGrady, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181723 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 14, 2025).*

Defendant’s guilty plea waives his Fourth Amendment claim. Hogenkamp v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184537 (W.D. Wis. Sep. 18, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Standing, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.