N.D.Ohio: When a stop is based on a law enforcement database, does reliability have to be shown? Here there was more

When a stop is based on a computerized law enforcement database, whether it has to be corroborated (see Gonzalez v. United States Immigration. & Customs Enf’t, 975 F.3d 788, 819 (9th Cir. 2020)) isn’t decided here because here there was additional information. United States v. Riordan, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113943 (N.D. Ohio June 28, 2024).

2255 petitioner’s claim that he was illegally detained [but he wasn’t] on state charges when he made an incriminating jail phone call was waived by his guilty plea, and would fail in any event. Carter v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113927 (D.S.D. June 25, 2024).*

2255 petitioner’s claim that the underlying search warrant was issued without probable cause fails because it’s nowhere in the record. All he attaches is a police report. CoA denied. Franks v. United States, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15762 (6th Cir. June 27, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.