D.Nev.: Franks challenges have two elements; failure of one is failure of the claim

The court can resolve Franks challenges by answering the easiest of the two questions, falsity or materiality, since both are required. Here, the alleged falsity wasn’t material to the probable cause determination, and that ends the inquiry. United States v. Dawson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86261 (D. Nev. May 15, 2020).*

The stop was not unreasonably continued because the officer was justified in being skeptical of defendant’s claim he had authority to be driving someone else’s car. Before the citation was written, the drug dog was on the scene. State v. Hale, 2020 Ida. App. LEXIS 46 (May 13, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.