CA10: Def would lose 4A issue in any event, so no IAC

2255 petitioner argued that state appellate counsel was ineffective for not challenging trial counsel’s ineffectiveness in failing to argue a knock-and-talk. The knock-and-talk would be valid in any event, so there can’t be any IAC. Moore v. McCollum, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19307 (10th Cir. Oct. 26, 2016).

A suspected drug dealer parked on a McDonald’s upper parking lot away from the store and looking around like looking for police was suspicious enough for a police encounter. The details were innocent, but on the totality (a lie in the story), there was reasonable suspicion. Santos v. State, 2016 Md. App. LEXIS 152 (Oct. 26, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.