TN: Passing the FST didn’t negate PC; bloodshot and watery eyes, smelled of alcohol, admitted to 3 beers

Passing the FST didn’t negate probable cause. The officer observed defendant speeding, and, when the officer approached defendant he smelled alcohol, defendant had bloodshot and watery eyes, and defendant told the officer he had consumed three beers. State v. Silva, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 158 (March 3, 2016).

Defendant was not seized and not in custody when he came to the police station with his girlfriend. He didn’t have to come, but he did. When the officers asked him for a statement, they conditioned it on his being honest. That still did not make him in custody, and the lack of Miranda warnings didn’t require suppression of the statement. Spencer v. United States, 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 44 (March 3, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.