Daily Archives: June 4, 2025

NJ: Entering curtilage to plant GPS device on car exceeded tracking warrant and was suppressed

Police had an otherwise valid warrant to install a tracking device on defendant’s vehicle but in a public place. Instead, they entered the curtilage to install it there. This warrant execution violated the Fourth Amendment and state constitution. The tracking … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Entering curtilage to plant GPS device on car exceeded tracking warrant and was suppressed

EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant by Matthew Guariglia (“New reporting has revealed that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) is attempting to create … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

LA5: Off-duty officer feeling a bag was a search, but bag was abandoned

Defendant left a bag on the counter of a gym and went outside and acted suspicious. An off-duty officer was a customer. He felt the bag, feeling a gun. Then police were called. This qualified as a government search, but … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity, Search, Standing | Comments Off on LA5: Off-duty officer feeling a bag was a search, but bag was abandoned

CA4: GFE doesn’t save search that wasn’t even authorized by the SW

The cell phone warrant here only authorized its seizure, not its search. Therefore, the good faith exception doesn’t even apply to save the search. United States v. Ray, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13483 (4th Cir. June 3, 2025). In sum:

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: GFE doesn’t save search that wasn’t even authorized by the SW