Daily Archives: November 19, 2021

Penn Live: Opinion: The concrete effects of body cameras on police accountability

Penn Live: Opinion: The concrete effects of body cameras on police accountability (“We are criminologists and economists, and our recent study has found that providing police officers with body cameras has a substantive effect on investigations of police accountability. The … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on Penn Live: Opinion: The concrete effects of body cameras on police accountability

OH5: Employer’s call to police def was probably driving drunk was RS

A Home Depot employee was sent home for working under the influence of alcohol. They used a PBT on him, and he was twice the limit. They tried to arrange a ride for him, but he attempted to drive off … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Employer’s call to police def was probably driving drunk was RS

IL: The foregone conclusion doctrine applies to providing passcode to search a cell phone

The foregone conclusion doctrine applies to obtaining the passcode to a cell phone to search it. Thus, production of the passcode is non-testimonial for the Fifth Amendment. People v. Sneed, 2021 IL App (4th) 210180, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 637 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on IL: The foregone conclusion doctrine applies to providing passcode to search a cell phone

CA6: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.”

As to probable cause: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.” Allen v. City of Ecorse, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 34348 (6th Cir. Nov. 18, 2021). Defendant’s guilty plea included a comprehensive … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.”

CA6: Sex with a court transport officer stated excessive force claim

Sexual intercourse with a court transport officer stated an excessive force claim. Plaintiff raised a factual dispute that the sex wasn’t consensual because of his control over her and a threat he made after he found out she talked about … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Sex with a court transport officer stated excessive force claim