Daily Archives: May 31, 2017

IL: “Immediately apparent” for plain view really means “probable cause”

Product bar codes found in plain view in defendant’s car were seized with probable cause. Officers experienced in investigating retail theft from a Best Buy were investigating thefts that involved altered bar codes. “Immediately apparent” for plain view really means … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IL: “Immediately apparent” for plain view really means “probable cause”

M.D.Fla.: Unauthorized driver of rented car with suspended DL had no REP in car even if driving with permission of renter

Defendant had a subjective reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental vehicle he was driving with permission of the renter and potentially the implicit permission of the rental company because he was seen in it by them. [Whether they knew … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Unauthorized driver of rented car with suspended DL had no REP in car even if driving with permission of renter

NY1: A request to produce ID isn’t always a seizure

The request to defendant to produce his ID when the police were investigating a potential trespass doesn’t constitute a seizure per se. Here, the defendant volunteered to take the officer to where he was going. That was all consent. People … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on NY1: A request to produce ID isn’t always a seizure

W.D.Mo.: Driveway not curtilage for dog sniff of car

Relying on United States v. Beene, 818 F.3d 157 (5th Cir. 2016) (posted here), defendant’s car parked on the driveway in front of his home was subject to a dog sniff as if it was on the street. Because of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Inventory | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Driveway not curtilage for dog sniff of car