Daily Archives: May 9, 2015

Photography Is Not A Crime (PINAC) — Police behaving badly

Photography Is Not A Crime (PINAC) has been cited here before, but a link on the internet took me there again today, and I perused it for a while, finding many interesting citizen-made videos of cops going overboard. One from … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Police misconduct | Comments Off on Photography Is Not A Crime (PINAC) — Police behaving badly

RI: LEO’s wife violated wiretap and SCA with keylogger, but his dept can use it in administrative proceedings

Plaintiff is a Rhode Island police officer whose wife installed a keylogger to track his computer usage about his potential infidelity. She turned it over to his department. He was suspended for two years with pay for the duration. Her … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Private search | Comments Off on RI: LEO’s wife violated wiretap and SCA with keylogger, but his dept can use it in administrative proceedings

NY4: Def consented to search of his person by entering a courthouse

Defendant entered the Hall of Justice in Rochester, and he set off the metal detector. Three hand wandings showed metal in his crotch. He was handcuffed and taken to a more secure area. A search of his person revealed gold … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NY4: Def consented to search of his person by entering a courthouse

D.D.C.: Exit border search of computer without reasonable suspicion was unreasonable

Defendant is a Korean businessman who regularly flew between Korea and California. The government suspected that shipments back to China for his business were routed to Iran, so they seized his laptop as he was leaving in 2012 to search … Continue reading

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Exit border search of computer without reasonable suspicion was unreasonable

On The Media: The Police Body Cam Conundrum

On The Media: The Police Body Cam Conundrum: There is overwhelming support to outfit the nation’s cops with body cameras. Theoretically, they promote accountability and transparency, but in practice it’s much more complicated.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on On The Media: The Police Body Cam Conundrum

WaPo: Bulk records collection nearing endgame

WaPo: Bulk records collection nearing endgame By Ellen Nakashima: For months, the debate around the future of the National Security Agency’s collection of millions of Americans’ phone records was framed as a stark choice between ending the program completely or … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on WaPo: Bulk records collection nearing endgame

NY Times: Airport Security Advances Clash With Privacy Issues

NY Times: Airport Security Advances Clash With Privacy Issues by Ron Nixon: BOSTON — At a mock airport in an underground laboratory here at Northeastern University, students pretending to be passengers head through a security exit in the right direction, … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NY Times: Airport Security Advances Clash With Privacy Issues

CA8: Circuit authority authorized dog sniff at door before Jardines so good faith applies

A pre-Jardines dog sniff outside the door was valid in this circuit, and the court has already sustained on good faith such a sniff in United States v. Davis, 760 F.3d 901, 903, 905 (8th Cir. 2014). United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA8: Circuit authority authorized dog sniff at door before Jardines so good faith applies

OR: PC for the automobile exception is not the same argument as car wasn’t mobile, so it’s waived for appeal

Defendant’s argument that there was not probable cause for the automobile exception is different from the issue of the automobile exception does not apply because the car was not mobile. Thus, it is not preserved for appeal. State v. Brock, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OR: PC for the automobile exception is not the same argument as car wasn’t mobile, so it’s waived for appeal