Daily Archives: April 23, 2015

W.D.Mo.: Officer’s subjective belief of “reasonable mistake of law” irrelevant under Heien

The stop was based on a municipal ordinance that prohibited obstructions “upon” the windshield or windows. The government relied on reasonable mistake of law under Heien v. North Carolina, but the court disagrees. An air freshener was not “upon” and … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Officer’s subjective belief of “reasonable mistake of law” irrelevant under Heien

NJ: Codefendant’s appeal not law of the case; parties get to argue their own cases

The decision in a co-defendant’s separate appeal on a search and seizure question is not “law of the case” as to another defendant’s appeal. The law of the case doctrine requires the same parties, and it would offend due process … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Codefendant’s appeal not law of the case; parties get to argue their own cases

IA: Where owner of car was a woman with a revoked DL, the officer didn’t see it was a man driving until he got to the driver’s window

The officer ran the LPN of the vehicle in front of him, and the owner, a woman, came back with a revoked DL. He stopped the car. When he got to the driver’s door, he saw a man, and then … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Where owner of car was a woman with a revoked DL, the officer didn’t see it was a man driving until he got to the driver’s window

D.Md.: A cell phone found on a drug dealer is virtually per se probable cause there is evidence to be found on it; it’s a “tool of the trade”

A cell phone found on a drug dealer is virtually per se probable cause there is evidence to be found on it. Thus, there was PC for a warrant and nexus to the crime. United States v. Fisher, 2015 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on D.Md.: A cell phone found on a drug dealer is virtually per se probable cause there is evidence to be found on it; it’s a “tool of the trade”

WaPo: In Fourth Amendment cases, it’s a toss-up

WaPo: In Fourth Amendment cases, it’s a toss-up by Orin Kerr: A lot of people think that today’s Supreme Court is conservative and pro-government in Fourth Amendment cases. It can be hard to analyze those views because they often hinge … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: In Fourth Amendment cases, it’s a toss-up

Columbus Dispatch: Supreme Court ruling on drug-dog searches should have little effect in Ohio

Columbus Dispatch: Supreme Court ruling on drug-dog searches should have little effect in Ohio by Alan Johnson: Officials with the Ohio State Highway Patrol and Columbus police said they already follow a procedure in which officers must have a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Columbus Dispatch: Supreme Court ruling on drug-dog searches should have little effect in Ohio